摘要
中国和美国尽管在管控淫秽物品的初衷、程序等方面存在诸多差异,但是美国于1957年利用"罗斯诉合众国案"确立了政府管控淫秽物品的权力边界,其制定和实施对中国立法有借鉴之价值。介绍了"罗斯诉合众国案"的背景,美国人对淫秽物品的争论与罗斯案的判决,中国管控淫秽物品的政策。采用历史情境法和案例分析法,阐述了二战后美国联邦政府确立以"司法惩治"为核心的管控淫秽物品模式的历史过程,比较分析了中美管控淫秽物品的政策,反思了中国在此问题上仍需改进的地方。建议中国有权机构对政府管控淫秽物品的行为进行司法审查,尽快认可公民性表达的自由权利,对淫秽物品的认定标准要顺应社会道德变迁的实际情况不断调整。
In spite of the fact that there are many differences between China and the United States in such as-pects as the original intention and procedure of controlling obscene objects,the United States made use of“Ross v.United States”in 1957 to establish the power boundary of government control of obscene objects and its development and implementation have reference value to legislation in China.The article introduces the background ”of The Ross v.United States case”,the American debate on obscene objects and the judgment of Ross case,and China＇s policy of controlling obscene objects.Using historical context and case analysis,the paper expounds on the historical process of the establishment of the judicial punishment as the core of the man-agement and control of obscene objects,makes a comparative analysis of the Sino US policy of controlling ob-scene objects,and gives self-examination of the aspects that need improving.The article suggests that China＇s authority should conduct judicial review of the government＇s control of obscene objects and recognize the free-dom of expressing civil rights as soon as possible,and that the standard of the identification of obscene objects should conform to the actual situation of the social and moral changes.
作者
王娟娟
WNAG Juanjuan(School of History ＆ Culture, Henan Normal University, Xinxiang 453007, Chin)
出处
《河南工业大学学报（社会科学版）》
2016年第4期22-28,35,共8页
Journal of Henan University of Technology:Social Science Edition
基金
2014年河南师范大学博士科研启动金项目"美国现代化进程中的淫秽品问题"(5101129171132)
关键词
淫秽物品
言论自由
最高法院
obscene objects
freedom of speech
Supreme Court
