摘要
元朝"令"在中国古代"令"的变迁史上具有较为特殊的意义。元朝"令"的问题中首先是它与"条格"的关系与区别。元朝法律形式主要通过"条格"与"断例"两种新的形式表现出来,让中国古代法律形式出现新的形式。元朝"条格"作为一种法律形式,在篇目和结构上全面继承了唐宋金时期"令"的篇名和结构,在体系结构上继承和发展了唐宋时期形成的事类分类体系,在内容上继承和融合了唐宋金时期敕、令、格、式和申明的内容,让中国古代法律形式从细化分类转向整合分类。元朝法律形式分类从繁杂走向了简约,同时保留了中国古代把法律规范区分为刑名(刑事)与非刑名(非刑事)两类基本分类的体系。这种法律形式的变迁是对唐宋时期法律形式种类繁杂现象的反叛。元朝"条格"在吸收"令"的内容同时,也保留了"令"的基本特征。
＂Ling＂ （Order） in Yuan dynasty has a special significance in the changing history of ＂or- der＂. The first question of Yuan ＂order＂ is its relationship and distinction with ＂rules and regulations＂. Yuan legal form, were mainly in two new forms, namely ＂legal provisions＂ and＂judgment criteria＂, which brought about new varieties for ancient Chinese legal form. As a legal form, the ＂legal provisions＂ inheri- ted the contents and structure of ＂order＂ in Tang, Song, and Jin dynasties. In the systematic structure, it inherited and developed the categorizing system which took its form in Tang and Song period. In content, it inherited and integrated the content of She, Ling, Ge, and Shengming, which transformed ancient Chi- nese detailed categorization into integrated categorization. The legal style in Yuan dynasty developed from complexity to simplicity. Meanwhile, it preserved the ancient Chinese system of legal norms divided into two basic classes, which are criminal and non-criminal types. This change of the legal form is a rebellion a- gainst the kind of complex phenomena in Tang and Song dynasties rebellion. Yuan ＂legal provisions＂ not only absorbed the content of ＂order＂, but also retained the basic characteristics of it.
出处
《内蒙古师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
2016年第4期136-149,共14页
Journal of Inner Mongolia Normal University：Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition
关键词
令
条格
法律形式
＂Ling＂ （order）
legal provisions
legal style
