摘要
文章对iSchools联盟77所成员院校的名称及更名情况进行了调查;选取了20所具有代表性的iSchools成员院校,对其核心课程设置情况进行了分析;采用基于词频统计的内容分析法,对这20所院校2011年到2015年间发表的学术论文和网站上公布的研究项目进行了计量分析。研究结论表明,iSchools无论在院校名称,还是在课程设置、学术研究方面,都存在明显的"去图书馆化"的倾向,这一趋势值得警惕。作者认为,"去图书馆化"不符合iSchools运动整合学科教育和研究资源的目的,并将丧失iSchools跨学科的特色和优势。"去图书馆化"也必然带来"图书馆"在信息职业和信息学科领域的话语权日渐式微,直至最后消解图书馆和图书情报学科发展的各种机遇,同时也不利于iSchools面向广泛的信息职业。
The paper investigates the name and its alteration of 77 members of iSchools Caucus and analyzes core curriculum of 20 representative iSchools. The content analysis method based on word frequency statistic is also used in this paper to conduct quan- titative analysis of academic papers and research projects of these 20 iSchools which are published and posted on the website from 2011 to 2015. The study concludes that there are obvious tendency to ＂Delibrarization＂ among name, course setting and scientific re- search of iSchools, and we should be alert to it. The author believes that the ＂Delibrarization＂ does not conform to the purpose of iSchools Movement which aims at integration of subject education and research resources, and will cause iSchools to lose its interdis- ciplinary characteristics and advantages. The ＂Delibrarization＂ will inevitably lead the ＂library＂ to fade away in the information pro- fession and information science, and finally dispels development opportunities of library and information science. In the meantime, it is not conducive to the iSchools for a wide range of information occupation.
出处
《图书情报知识》
CSSCI
北大核心
2017年第1期19-25,共7页
Documentation,Information & Knowledge
