摘要
本文利用CGSS2010中国综合社会调查数据实证分析了异质性政治参与、政治能效感和家庭高风险资产决策之间的因果关系及作用机制问题。研究发现,居民的政治参与行为有助于家庭参与高风险资产参与决策,居民不同的政治参与类型对家庭参与高风险资产决策存在差异化影响:居民的"抗争类政治参与"、"意见反馈类政治参与"能够显著的提升其家庭参与高风险资产参与决策的概率,而"投票类政治参与"并不显著对家庭参与高风险投资产生影响。进一步的分析表明,居民的教育程度能够显著地弱化了政治参与和政治效能感对家庭高风险活动的边际影响;同时本文分析了居民政治效能感、政治参对家庭高风险投资决策的影响渠道,结果表明政治参与通过媒体信息获取路径提升了家庭高风险投资参与决策概率。
This paper provides an individual-level empirical analysis on the way in which the political efficacy,heterogeneous political participation affect Chinese household high risk asset allocation by using the 2010 Chinese General Social Survey(CGSS 2010).This study finds that,resident's political participation raises the high risk investment participation,the different kinds of political participation of residents have different impact on household high risk asset allocation.'The contending type political participation'and 'the feedback type political participation'will significantly enhance the participation of investing in high risk asset,while'the voting type political participation'has no significant effect.Furthermore,residents' education level can significantly weaken the political participation and the political efficacy marginal effect.Meanwhile,this paper analyzes the impact channels between the political efficacy and political participation on family high risk asset allocation.The results shows that political participation raises the high risk asset allocation through the media channel.
出处
《当代经济科学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2017年第1期62-74,共13页
Modern Economic Science
基金
四川农业大学社科研究专项重点项目"社会网络视角下异质性金融支持与新生代农民工创业研究"(项目编号:2015ZD02)
关键词
政治效能感
政治参与
家庭高风险投资决策
路径分析
Political efficacy
Political participation
Household high risk asset allocation
Path analysis
