期刊文献+

早期应用不同剂量替罗非班在急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者中的临床观察 被引量:9

Clinical observation of early application of different doses of tirofiban in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨早期应用不同剂量替罗非班对急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者的临床疗效和安全性。方法:选取急诊行冠状动脉支架植入术(PCI)的103例STEMI患者,按照随机数字表法,根据给药时间分为早期给药组(67例)和晚期给药组(36例),早期给药组根据药物剂量又分为低剂量组(33例)和常规剂量组(34例)。观察3组患者术前、术后梗死相关血管TIMI血流分级,术后90 min ST段抬高回落百分比,心肌损伤标志物变化,术后7 d内出血事件及30 d内心血管不良事件发生率。结果:(1)3组术后TIMI 3级血流患者比例均显著高于术前(均P<0.05),早期给药组TIMI 3级血流比例显著高于晚期给药组(P<0.05)。(2)早期给药组90 min ST段回落百分比明显高于晚期给药组(P<0.05),而早期两组组间比较无差异(P>0.05)。(3)与晚期给药组相比,早期给药组可显著降低术后血清肌酸激酶同工酶水平(P<0.05),但3组术后肌钙蛋白水平无明显差异(P>0.05)。(4)3组主要心血管事件(MACE)发生率无明显差异(P>0.05),低剂量组出血发生率低于常规剂量组(P<0.05),而血小板减少发生率无明显差异(P>0.05)。结论:早期应用替罗非班可改善急性STEMI患者PCI术后心肌血流的再灌注,且未增加临床不良事件的发生风险。低剂量与常规剂量相比,疗效相当,且出血发生率更低,安全性更高。 Objective: To evaluate the clinical effect and safety of early application of different doses of tirofiban in patients with acute ST- segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Methods: One hundred and three cases of patients with STEMI receiving emergency coronary stenting were randomized into early administration of tirofiban group (n=67)and later administration group (n=36)according to the time of drug administration;The early administration group was divided into low dose group (33 cases) and conventional dose group (34 cases) .The TIMI flow classification, the percentage of ST segment depression at 90 min, myocardial markers, 7-day bleeding events and 30-day adverse cardiovascular events were observed and compared among the three groups before and after operation. Results: ( 1 )The TIMI 3 flow grade after operation in the three groups were significantly higher than those before operation (P〈O.05), and the proportion of the TIMI 3 grade flow in the early administration group was significant higher than that in the later administration group (P〈0.05). (2)The percentage of ST segment depression at 90 min in the early administration group was significantly higher than that in the later treatment group (P〈0.05), and the former two groups had no significant difference (P〉0.05).(3)Compared with the later administration group, the levels of CK-MB in the early treatment group decreased significantly (P〈0.05),but the cTnI levels had no significant differences in the three groups (P〉0.05).(4)The incidence of major cardiovascular events (MACE) in the three groups presented no significant differences (P〉0.05). The hemorrhage incidence in low dose group was significantly lower than that in conventional dose group (P〈0.05), but thrombocytopenia occurred rate had no significant difference (P〉0.05). Conclusion:Early application of tirofiban could significantly improve myocardial reperfusion and clinical outcomes in patients with STEMI undergoing PCI. Compared with the conventional dose, the bleeding incidence of low dose is lower, and the safety is higher.
作者 刘杰 宋书凯
出处 《天津医科大学学报》 2017年第1期59-62,共4页 Journal of Tianjin Medical University
关键词 急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死 替罗非班 冠状动脉介入治疗 心肌再灌注 acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction tirofiban percutaneous coronary intervention myocardial reperfusion
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献34

  • 1Xiao Liu,Gui-Zhou Tao.Effects of tirofiban on the reperfusion-related no-reflow in rats with acute myocardial infarction[J].Journal of Geriatric Cardiology,2013,10(1):52-58. 被引量:14
  • 2张优.Short- or long-outcome of early tirofiban in ST-segment elevated acute myocardial infarction undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention[J].China Medical Abstracts(Internal Medicine),2014,31(2):96-96. 被引量:1
  • 3宋玉娥.Evaluation on the Safety and Efficacy of Tirofiban in the Treatment of Acute Coronary Syndrome[J].Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology(Medical Sciences),2007,27(2):142-144. 被引量:24
  • 4De Servi S, Mariani M, Vandoni P, et al. Use of glycoprotein Ⅱb/Ⅲa inhibitors in invasively-treated patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome. J Cardiovasc Med ( Hagerstown ) , 2006,7 : 159 -165.
  • 5Stone GW, Bertrand ME, Moses JW, et al. Routine upstream initiation vs deferred selective use of glycoprotein Ⅱb/Ⅲa inhibitors in acute coronary syndromes: the ACUITY Timing trial. JAMA, 2007,297:591-602.
  • 6Ernst NM, Suryapranata H, Miedema K, et al. Achieved platelet aggregation inhibition after different antiplatelet regimens during percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2004,44 : 1187-1193.
  • 7Valgimigli M, Percoco G, Barbieri D, et al. The additive value of tirofiban administered with the high-dose bolus in the prevention of ischemic complications during high-risk coronary angioplasty: the ADVANCE Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol,2004,44 : 14-19.
  • 8The RESTORE Investigators. Effects of platelet glycoprotein Ⅱb/Ⅲa blockade with tirofiban on adverse cardiac events in patients with unstable angina or acute myocardial infarction undergoing coronary angioplasty. Randomized Efficacy Study of Tirofiban for Outcomes and REstenosis. Circulation, 1997,96 : 1445-1453.
  • 9Danzi GB, Capuano C, Sesana M, et al. Variability in extent of platelet function inhibition after administration of optimal dose of glycoprotein Ⅱb/Ⅲa receptor blockers in patients undergoing a high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol,2006, 97,489-493.
  • 10Zhnu SS, Tian F, Chen YD, et al. Combination therapy reduces the incidence of no-re-flow after primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction [J]. J Geriatr Cardiol , 2015, 12: 135-142.

共引文献101

同被引文献75

引证文献9

二级引证文献47

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部