摘要
司法政策既是制度运行过程中政治与法律相互作用的结果,同时也是一个重新界分现有权力结构、权力关系与格局过程的政策性产物。面对质疑,从形式正当性和实质正当性两条路径,阐释了司法政策实质是最高人民法院行使司法管理权的一种方式。司法政策获得正当性是立法缺位与司法能动下为实现大局司法的必然结果,但其也要得到政治与社会的双重认同。为体现实质正义与程序正义的双重价值,应明确制定程序,引入专家论证和公众参与。
Justice policy process in both the political and legal system run interaction,but also a re-bound sub existing power structure,the product of power relations policy process and pattern. The face of challenge,from the form and substance of the legitimacy of the two paths,the judicial policy is essentially a way to the Supreme Court to exercise judicial management rights. Justification is a judicial policy to obtain the absence of legislation and judicial activism for the realization of the inevitable result of the overall administration of justice,but also get dual identity politics and society. To reflect the essence of justice and procedural justice dual value,it should be clearly defined procedures,the introduction of experts and public participation.
出处
《法律科学（西北政法大学学报）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2017年第1期19-25,共7页
Science of Law：Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law
基金
国家社科基金青年项目(12CFX024)"行政诉讼司法政策研究"
关键词
最高人民法院
司法政策
正当性
公众参与
The Supreme People＇s Court
Judicial Policy
Justification
Public participation
