摘要
试图用德、日的行为共同说来解释我国刑法规定的共同犯罪,不仅是行不通的路径,而且其理论根据也不可靠。我国刑法规定的共同犯罪之所以不能用行为共同说来解释,归根到底是因为行为共同说是区分正犯与共犯的区分制犯罪参与体系的产物,而我国刑法采取的是不区分正犯与共犯的单一正犯体系。德、日刑法中的共同正犯或共犯必须在定罪阶段(犯罪论层次)确定,而我国刑法中的共同犯罪则是在量刑(处罚)阶段才涉及的问题。
Trying to apply the theory of behavior in common from German and Japanese criminal laws to explain joint offence regulated by Chinese criminal law is neither practical nor rational. The basic reason is that the theory of behavior in common is generated from differentiate system of complicity which has distinguished principal and accomplice,while the unitary system of complicity,which Chinese criminal law has adopted,does not divide principal and accomplice. In German and Japanese criminal laws,principal and accomplice should be determined during the stage of conviction. However,joint offence is considered during the stage of sentencing in Chinese criminal law.
出处
《法律科学（西北政法大学学报）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2017年第1期61-66,共6页
Science of Law：Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law
基金
教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目(16JD820018)"犯罪参与基本问题研究"
关键词
共同犯罪
行为共同
单一正犯
主犯
从犯
Joint offence
Behavior in common
Unitary system of complicity
Principal
accomplice
