摘要
刑法分则中并非所有行为都是实行行为,有些明文规定的行为可能包括预备行为。在判断实行行为时,应以统一说作为认定实行行为的理论依据。分则中的"编造"、"故意造成"以及"捏造"等都是各罪的预备行为,相应地,各罪的实行行为只能是"传播"、"骗取"以及"散布"等;巨额财产来源不明罪的实行行为是"持有";挪用公款罪的实行行为是"挪";正确理解刑法分则中的实行行为,能够妥当解决追诉时效、共犯以及罪数等问题,得出合理的解释结论。
Not all conducts in special provisions of criminal laws are penetrating acts, because some acts in articles may include preparation ones. When defining executive acts, theory of unity can function as a basis on which acts are determined. In special provisions, ＂drawing up purposeful acts fabrication＂ are preparations, which accordingly correspond with ＂disseminating＂, ＂cheating＂ and ＂scattering＂. Huge amounts of property from unidentified sources crime＇s executive act is ＂holding＂; misappropriating public funds crime＇s executive conduct is ＂moving＂. A right understanding of penetrating acts of special provisions of criminal law helps to deal with problems with limitation of prosecution, complicity and quantity of crime, which is conducive to reaching reasonable conclusions.
作者
卢星翰
LU Xing-han(Huaian Intermediate People＇s Court, Huaian 223001, China)
出处
《南京工程学院学报（社会科学版）》
2016年第4期1-5,共5页
Journal of Nanjing Institute of Technology：Social Science Edition
关键词
实行行为
统一说
追诉时效
共犯
罪数
penetrating act
theory of unity
limitation of prosecution
complicity
quantity of crime
