期刊文献+

透视美国研究型大学本科教学与科研关系的迷局 被引量:16

To Understand the Puzzle of the Relationship between Undergraduate Teaching and Research in American Research Universities
原文传递
导出
摘要 20世纪八九十年代以来,为应对社会批评,美国研究型大学开启了重建本科教育的运动,以平衡本科教学与科研关系。但这场改革的结果却是一场迷局。有些证据显示,美国研究型大学的本科教育得到极大关注,教学质量有很大改善;而也有证据显示,美国研究型大学本科教学与科研的失衡状况依旧,甚至更为突出。新制度主义可以给这一迷局提供一种答案,即美国研究型大学为了合法存在,设立了一些改革本科教育,提升教学质量的正式制度,同时又采取大量使用兼职教师和研究生助教,虚化教学学术,实施新进步主义教学等非正式策略,虚置了正式制度。由此,美国研究型大学就用正式制度向社会展示了重视本科教学的形象,又通过非正式策略,依然重视科研。 In response to social criticism, the American research university opened the reconstruction of undergraduate education to balance the relationship between undergraduate teaching and research since the 1980s and the 1990s. But the result was a puzzle. Some evidence suggested that the situation had improved, but other suggested that imbalance of undergraduate teaching and research had been even more serious. New institutionalism could provide an answer to the puzzle. In order to exist legally, the American research university set up some formal systems to improve the undergraduate teaching, but at the same time took a lot of informal strategies, such as more employment of part-time teachers and graduate assistants, along with new progressive teaching. In this way, the American research university with formal system showed the society the image of paying great attention to undergraduate teaching, and still attaching great importance to research at the same time through informal strategy.
作者 吴洪富 WU Hong-fu(School of Education, Henan University, Kaifeng 475004, Chin)
出处 《高等教育研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第12期94-102,共9页 Journal of Higher Education
基金 河南省哲学社会科学规划项目(2013CJY008)
关键词 美国研究型大学 教学与科研关系 新制度主义 正式制度 非正式策略 American research university relationship between teaching and research new institutionalism formal system informal strategy
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献139

  • 1Lionel S. Lewis, Scaling the Ivory Tower: Merit and Its Limits in Academic Careers, The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1975, p9, pl 1, p27, p7-8.
  • 2Modem Language Association (MLA):Meritocracy. Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. 31 Jul. 2007. <Reference.corn http://www.reference.com/browse/wiki/Meritocracy>
  • 3Financial Administration of Harvard University, Financial Report to the Board of Overseers of Harvard College: Fiscal Year 2005-2006 [EB/OL]. http://vpf-web.harvard.edu/an- nualfinancial, 2007-08-01.
  • 4Financial Data, Fiscal Year 2006, Operational Revenues, [ EB/OL]. http://web.mit.edu/facts/financial.html,2007-08- 01.
  • 5Lionel S. Lewis, Marginal Worth: Teaching and the Academic Labor Market, Transaction Publishers, 1996, 51-52, 52-53, 133.
  • 6爱德华·希尔斯著.学术的秩序:当代大学论文集[M].李家永译.商务印书馆,2007.23.
  • 7Elka Jones, Beyond supply and demand: assessing the Ph. D. job market: the path travelled by Ph.D. students and workers promise challenge and reward in varying degree, Occupational Outlook Quarterly, ?Winter, 2002.
  • 8Richard Miller, Evaluating Faculty for Promotion and Tenure, Jossey-bass Inc. 1987, 49, 93N94.
  • 9MichaelF. Middaugh, Understanding Faculty Productivity: Standards and Benchmarks for Colleges and Universifies, Jossey-Bass Publishers, 2001, 9, 10-24, 15.
  • 10Edited by William G. Tierney, Faculty Productivity: Facts, Fictions, and Is sues, Falmer Press, 1999,18 - 19, 160.

共引文献272

同被引文献89

引证文献16

二级引证文献558

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部