摘要
在"新汉语史"的框架下,分析文言史上的问题可以看出,第一,文言史是复线而不是单线的。文言史包含两条线索:一是同质文言史,二是异质文言史。第二,文言在现代汉语中并未"死亡",仍然存在,也从未离开。从另一个角度说,文言史并未终结,仍在持续;其三,异质文言是沟通古今的桥梁。新汉语史的构建,可以为梳理现代汉语的来龙去脉提供另一种思路和角度,是建立异质文言史的一种努力和尝试。
This article discusses three questions related to the history of classical Chinese under the framework of the new history of Chinese language ： first, the author puts forward the concept of double track history of classical Chinese, which holds that the history of classical Chinese contains two clues ： one is homogeneous history of classical Chinese, the other is the heterogeneous classical Chinese history; second, as for the problem of classical Chinese dead or alive in modem Chinese, the basic conclusion is that classical Chinese is still here, never having left. From another perspective, the history of classical Chinese continues , it has not ended ; third, heterogeneous classical Chinese is the bridge to link up ancient and modem Chinese, trying to provide another way of thinking and perspective to clarify the context of modem Chinese, which is also an attempt at setting up the complete heterogeneous classical Chinese through ancient and modem Chinese.
出处
《陕西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2017年第1期57-68,共12页
Journal of Shaanxi Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)
基金
国家社会科学基金重大项目"百年汉语发展演变数据平台建设与研究"(13&ZD133)
关键词
汉语史
文言
文言史
history of Chinese language
ancient Chinese
history of ancient Chinese
