期刊文献+

经前期症状评定简表中文版在大学女生中的适用性 被引量:1

The Application of the Shortened Premenstrual Assessment form in Chinese Female Undergraduates
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:建立经前期症状评定简表(the shortened premenstrual assessment form,SPAF)的中文版,并检验其在女大学生中的适用性。方法:1549名女大学生完成了SPAF等自评量表,其中有123人间隔1个月第二次完成SPAF。结果:SPAF中文版总量表的Cronbach’sα系数为0.89,三因子Cronbach’sα系数在0.77~0.93之间;条目间平均相关系数总量表为0.35,三因子在0.31~0.50之间;间隔1个月的重测信度总量表为0.87,三因子在0.82~0.91之间。验证性因素分析的指标(GFI=0.95,AGFI=0.93,CFI=0.90,RMSEA=0.046;条目对因子负荷系数在0.37~0.81之间;各因子间的潜相关系数在0.43~0.69之间)均符合测量学要求。回归分析显示:月经不规律、高BMI值、吸烟及高应激得分是女大学生发生经前期综合征的危险因素。结论:经前期症状评定简表中文版具有良好的信、效度。月经不规律、吸烟、肥胖、高应激水平是经前期综合征发生的危险因素。 Objective: To develop a Chinese version of the shortened premenstrual assessment form(SPAF) and examine its psychometric properties in female Undergraduates. Methods: A sample of 1549 female undergraduate students finished SPAF and other self-report scales, and 145 of them finished the SPAF one month later. Results: The Cronbach' s α coefficient of the SAIS was 0.89, and ranged from 0.77 to 0.93 for its three factors, The MIC was 0.35. The test-retest reliability coefficient was 0.87 for total scale and 0.82, 0.91, 0.91 for its three factors, respectively. The GFI(0.95), AGFI(0.93), CFI (0.91), and RMSEA(0.046) all met the criteria standards for adequacy of fit, as well as the factor loading coefficient of each item(0.37-0.81). Logistic regression analysis showed that irregular menstruation, smoking, high BMI and high stress scores were risk factors for PMS. Conclusion: The Chinese version of the SPAF is a reliable and valid measure for assessing PMS in Chinese female undergraduates. Irregular menstruation, smoking, obesity and high stress perception may be risk factors for PMS.
出处 《中国临床心理学杂志》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2017年第1期97-100,共4页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
基金 国家自然科学基金(81370034)
关键词 经前期综合征 信度 效度 危险因素 Premenstrual syndrome Reliability Validity Risk factors
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献29

  • 1教育部《大学生心理健康测评系统》课题组,梁宝勇,郝志红.《中国大学生心理应激量表》的编制[J].心理与行为研究,2005,3(2):81-87. 被引量:95
  • 2石其昌,章健民,徐方忠,费立鹏,许毅,傅永利,顾卫,周夏江,王淑敏,张滢,俞敏.浙江省15岁及以上人群精神疾病流行病学调查[J].中华预防医学杂志,2005,39(4):229-236. 被引量:299
  • 3张明园.生活事件量表常模结果[J].中国神经精神疾病杂志,1987,13(2):70-70.
  • 4梁宝勇.精神压力、应对与健康.北京:教育科学出版社,Z00a.
  • 5Chamberlain K, Zike S. The Mimor Events Approach to Stress: Support For the Use of Daily hassles. British:Journal of Psychology, 1990, 81:469-481.
  • 6朱熊兆,唐秋萍,姚树桥.健康心理学.天津:南开大学出版社,2005,129-134.
  • 7Holmes T H, Rahe R H. The social readjustment rating scale. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 1967,11 :213-218.
  • 8张亚林 杨德森.生活事件量表的编制与研究[J].中国行为医学科学杂志,1992,1(2):6-6.
  • 9Blankstein K R, Flett G L, Koledin S. The Brief College Student Hassles Scale: Development, validation, and relatiOn with pessimism. Journal of College Student Development,1991,32:258-264.
  • 10Dunkley D M, Blankstein K R, Halsalll J, et al. The relation between perfectionism and distress: hassles coping and perceived social support as mediators and moderators. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 2000,47,437-453.

共引文献34

同被引文献14

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部