期刊文献+

腹腔镜下腹膜透析置管术的临床应用 被引量:15

The clinical application of laparoscopic abdominal membrane dialysis
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨腹腔镜下腹膜透析置管术治疗终末期肾脏疾病的临床疗效及安全性。方法行腹腔镜下腹膜透析置管术治疗的终末期肾病患者175例。首次置管130例,传统置管术后再次置管45例。记录患者术后疼痛评分,随访期间有无隧道感染、置管堵塞、置管移位、重新置管率等相关指标。结果 175例患者均在腹腔镜下顺利完成手术,无中转开腹患者。手术时间30~60分钟,平均45.6分钟;术后3~9天出院,平均4.5天。随访时间3~36个月,平均20.4个月。使用肝素水于术后第2天开始冲洗置管,于术后4~9天后开始透析。4例患者进行腹膜透析治疗时流出淡血性液体,均于术后5~7天消失。患者术后疼痛评分(2.13±0.73)分,术后发生切口感染4例,均经换药处理后痊愈出院。2例患者分别于术后4个月、6个月因隧道口感染行腹膜透析置管取出术,随访过程中未发现导管移位、导管阻塞等情况,临床效果良好。结论腹腔镜下腹膜透析置管术与传统开腹手术比较,切口感染发生率低,并发症少,疼痛轻,恢复快。 Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of laparoscopic peritoneal dialysis in the treatment of end-stage renal diseases.Methods The clinical data of 175 patients with end-stage renal disease treated by laparoscopic peritoneal dialysis catheter were analyzed retrospectively.There were 130 patients treated by catheter for the first time,45 patients were remedied again.Postoperative pain score and follow-up period were observed in patients whether there were tunnel infection,catheter block-age,catheter displacement,rate of re intubation and other related indicators.Results 175 patients were successfully completed laparoscopic minimally invasive surgery,no conversion to open surgery.Surgery time was 30-60 minutes,an average of 45.6 minutes;discharge time was 3-9 days after surgery,average 4.5days.Follow-up time ranged from 3 to 36 months with an average of 20.4 months.Heparin was used to flush the catheter in the second day,after 4-9 days starting dialysis.4 cases with mild bloody liquid after therapy were recorded in 5-7 days.Postoperative pain score was 2.13 ±0.73,incision 4 patients were oc-curred infectionin after operation,who were cured and discharged from our hospital after positive dressing change.2 cases were treated by peritoneal dialysis catheter removal because of tunnel infection after 4 months and 6 months,respectively.During the follow-up,no catheter displacement,catheter blockage and other conditions were found,clinical effect was good.Conclusion Compared with the traditional open surgery,laparoscopic peritoneal dialysis catheter has incision infection rate lower,fewer complications,less pain,recovery fast and many other advantages,which is worth to be promoted.
出处 《临床外科杂志》 2017年第1期58-60,共3页 Journal of Clinical Surgery
基金 新疆维吾尔自治区人民医院院内科研资助项目(20130320)
关键词 终末期肾病 腹腔镜 腹膜透析置管术 end-stage renal diseases laparoscopic abdominal membrane dialysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献30

  • 1李龙海,李秀勇,梁桂芳,李锋,江鹏,于圣士,曾建中,李勇.腹膜透析临床初探[J].透析与人工器官,2004,15(2):38-41. 被引量:2
  • 2李龙海.腹膜透析治疗肾功能衰竭时植管方法的临床探讨[J].安徽医学,2005,26(2):127-129. 被引量:15
  • 3李龙海.腹膜透析治疗肾功能衰竭的新理念[J].中国综合临床,2005,21(12):1105-1107. 被引量:6
  • 4Bargman J M. Advances in peritioneal dialysis:a review [J].Semin Dial, 2012,25:545-549.
  • 5Asif A. Peritioneal dialysis catheter insertion[J].Mi- nerva Chit, 2005,60:417-428.
  • 6Ash S R. Chronic peritioneal dialysis catheter:proce- dures for placement, maintenance, and removal[J]. Semin Nephrol, 2002,22:221-236.
  • 7Mella M C, Chula D C. Peritioneal dialysis access:what' s the best approach?[J].Contrib Nephrol, 2012,178:221-227.
  • 8Asif A, Tawakol J, Khan T, et al. Modification of the peritoneoscopic technique of peritoneal dialysis cathe terinsertion :experience of an interventional nephrolo- gy program[J]. Sem in Dial, 2004,17:171-177.
  • 9zhang L, Liu J, Shu J. en al. low-site peaitoneal catheter implantatiun decreases tip migration andomental wrap- ping[J], perit diat Int, 2011,31:202-204.
  • 10Bailie GR, Eisele G. Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialy- sis: a review of its mechanics, advantages, complications, and areas of controversy[J]. Ann Pharmacother, 1992, 26 (4), 1409-1420.

共引文献33

同被引文献106

引证文献15

二级引证文献69

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部