期刊文献+

腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术与平片式无张力疝修补术治疗成年人腹股沟复发疝临床对比研究 被引量:15

Clinical comparative analysis of Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal repair and path tension -free ;hernioplasty in the treatment of recurrent inguinal hernia in adults
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:比较腹腔镜下经腹腹膜前疝修补术(TAPP)与平片式无张力疝修补术(Lichtenstein术)治疗成年人腹股沟复发疝的临床疗效,探讨TAPP治疗腹股沟复发疝的临床优势。方法回顾性分析2010年12月至2015年1月寿光市人民医院普外科及潍坊市人民医院胃肠外科收治的54例成人腹股沟复发疝患者,根据治疗方法不同分为TAPP组和Lichtenstein组,比较两组患者手术时间、术中出血量、术后住院时间、住院费用、术后并发症、术后疼痛及疝复发等的差异。结果所有患者均顺利完成手术,TAPP组手术时间(47.2±9.4)min,明显短于Lichtenstein组的(73.1±10.4)min(t=-2.503,P=0.034),术中出血量中位数40(15~110)mL,明显少于Lichtenstein组的73(11~130)mL(t=-6.018,P=0.000),术后住院时间(6.5±1.4)d,短于Lichtenstein组的(8.2±1.6)d(t=-2.613,P=0.028),术后早期疼痛评分(1.8±1.2)分,优于Lichtenstein组的(2.9±1.4)分(t=-7.006,P=0.000),差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05);TAPP组住院期间费用(8842.8±415.2)元,高于Lichtenstein组的(6676.9±327.6)元,差异有统计学意义(t=6.782,P<0.05)。TAPP组术后2例出现并发症,少于Lichtenstein组的5例;术后随访6~48个月,Lichtenstein组1例复发,复发率为3.8%,TAPP组无复发。结论 TAPP治疗成年人腹股沟复发疝具有手术时间短、术中出血少、术后恢复快、术后疼痛轻等优点,可作为治疗成年人腹股沟复发疝的推荐手术方式。 Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic repair of laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal(TAPP)and Lichtenstein tension-free repair herniorrhaphy in the treatment of recurrent inguinal hernia in adults,and to explore the clinical advantages of TAPP in the treatment of recurrent inguinal hernia.Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted in 54 adult patients with recurrent inguinal hernia from December 2010 to January 2015.The patients were randomly divided into TAPP group and Lichtenstein group.The operation time,intraoperative bleeding volume,postoperative hospitalization time,cost of hospitalization,postoperative complications,early postoperative pain and the recurrence of hernia were compared between the two groups.Results All patients were successfully completed surgery.The operation time of TAPP group (47.2 ±9.4)min was significantly shorter than (73.1 ±10.4)min of Lichtenstein group (t=-2.503,P=0.034).The median amount of bleeding during operation of TAPP group was 40(15 -110)ml,which was significantly less than 73(11 -130)ml in Lichtenstein group (t=-6.018,P=0.000). Postoperative hospital stay of TAPP group[(6.5 ±1.4)d]was shorter than (8.2 ±1.6)d of the Lichtenstein group (t=-2.613,P=0.028).Early postoperative pain score of TAPP group[(1.8 ±1.2)points]was better than (2.9 ± 1.4)points in Lichtenstein group (t=-7.006,P=0.000),the difference was statistically significant.However,the hospitalization cost of TAPP group[(8 842.8 ±415.2)yuan]was higher than (6 676.9 ±327.6)yuan of the Lichtenstein group,the difference was statistically significant(t=6.782,P〈0.05).In TAPP group,2 cases had complications after operation,which were less than 5 cases of Lichtenstein group.Postoperative follow up ranged from 6 to 48 months,1 case of recurrence in Lichtenstein group,the recurrence rate was 3.8%.There was no recurrence in the TAPP group.Conclusion TAPP has the advantages of short operation time,less bleeding,rapid postoperative recovery,less postoperative pain and so on.It can be used as a recommended procedure for the treatment of recurrent inguinal hernia in adults.
出处 《中国基层医药》 CAS 2017年第3期351-354,共4页 Chinese Journal of Primary Medicine and Pharmacy
基金 山东省潍坊市卫生和计划生育委员会科研计划项目(2016wsjs035)
关键词 腹股沟 腹腔镜 经腹腹膜前疝修补术 平片式无张力疝修补术 复发 Hernia,inguinal Laparoscopy Transabdominal preperitioneal laparoscopic herniorrhaphy Path tension-free hernioplasty Recurrence
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献80

  • 1马颂章.疝外科学[M]5版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2003:317-339.
  • 2Simons MP,Aufenacker T,Bay-Nielsen M,et al.European Hernia Society guidelines on the treatment of inguinal hernia in adult patients[J].Hernia,2009,13(4):343-403.
  • 3Itani M,Fitzgibbons R Jr,Awad SS,et al.Management of recurrent inguinal hernias[J].J Am Coll Surg,2009,209(5):653-658.
  • 4Junge K,Rosch R,Klinge U,et al.Risk factors related to recurrence in inguinal hernia repair:a retrospective analysis[J].Hernia,2006,10(4):309-315.
  • 5Totté E,Van Hee R,Kox G,et al.Surgical anatomy of the inguinal region:implications during inguinal laparoscopic herniorrhaphy[J].Eur Surg Res,2005,37(3):185-190.
  • 6Fitzgibbons RJ Jr,Giobbie-Hurder A,Gibbs JO,et al.Watchful waiting vs repair of inguinal hernia in minimally symptomatic men:a randomized clinical trial[J].JAMA,2006,295(3):285-292.
  • 7Earle DB,Mark LA.Prosthetic material in inguinal hernia repair:how do I choose?[J].Surg Clin North Am,2008,88(1):179-201.
  • 8Taylor C,Layani L,Liew V,et al.Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair without mesh fixation,early results of a large randomised clinical trial[J].Surg Endosc,2008,22(3):757-762.
  • 9Agarwal BB,Agarwal KA,Mahajan KC.Prospective double-blind randomized controlled study comparing heavy-and lightweight polypropylene mesh in totally extraperitoneal repair of inguinal hernia:early results[J].Surg Endosc,2009,23(2):242-247.
  • 10Tantia O,Jain M,Khanna S,et al.Laparoscopic repair of recurrent groin hernia:results of a prospective study[J].Surg Endosc,2009,23(4):734-738.

共引文献147

同被引文献98

引证文献15

二级引证文献66

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部