摘要
法律解释与法律推理作为两种相对独立的法律方法,存在不可分割的交融关系,它们对法治建设有着不同的意义。法律解释的功能是要充分展示法律文本的各种可能意义,而法律推理则强调结论的必然得出。由于二者都强调根据法律进行解释或推理,因而拥有大体相似的思维走向。但作为法律方法论体系的不同组成,二者在地位、作用、关联等方面都存在许多细微的差别,必须加以区分。
As two relatively independent legal methods,there is an integral blending between the legal reasoning and the legal？interpretation which has a different meaning to the rule of law.The function of the legal？interpretation is to fully display all possible meanings of legal text, while the legal reasoning emphasizes the inevitable conclusion.Because both of them emphasize the interpretation or reasoning according to the law, they have broadly similar ways of thinking.However, as a different part of legal methodology system,there are many subtle differences between the legal reasoning and the legal interpretation in terms of status,function and correlation and so on,which should be distinguished strictly.
出处
《理论界》
2017年第1期76-80,共5页
Theory Horizon
关键词
法律推理
法律解释
方法论
legal reasoning,legal interpretation,methodology
