期刊文献+

腰椎棘突间动态稳定系统治疗腰椎滑脱症的临床疗效 被引量:7

Efficacy of Coflex in the treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 探讨腰椎棘突间动态稳定系统(Coflex)治疗Ⅰ度腰椎退变性滑脱的手术疗效.方法 对2008年1月至2011年12月首都医科大学附属北京朝阳医院收治的38例L4~L5Ⅰ度退变性滑脱症患者进行回顾性分析.依据手术方法的不同,将患者分为椎板间开窗减压+Coflex棘突间动态内固定组(A组)和腰椎后路减压椎弓根钉固定椎间植骨融合组(B组).其中A组15例,年龄42 ~ 75岁,平均(56.3±9.1)岁;B组23例,年龄45 ~ 77岁,平均(58.2±11.2)岁.采用疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)、Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)评定临床疗效.测量术前、术后手术节段及相邻节段椎间角变化,手术节段和相邻节段矢状位滑脱距离(SD).采用SPSS 19.0统计学软件对两组患者术前、术后1年及末次随访时的VAS、ODI、手术节段和邻近节段的椎间角、手术节段矢状位SD等数据进行配对t检验.结果 两组患者随访时间为36~ 68个月,平均随访(39±14)个月.A组患者手术时间、出血量均少于B组(分别为t=2.11、t=2.32,P<0.05).VAS评分:与术前相比,两组患者术后1年及末次随访时VAS腰痛评分均明显减小,差异有统计学意义(A组分别为t=2.85、t=2.93,B组分别为t=2.78、t=2.82,P值均<0.05);两组患者术后1年及末次随访时VAS腿痛评分均明显减小,差异有统计学意义(A组分别为t=2.91、t=2.97,B组分别为t=2.86、t=2.91,P值均<0.05).ODI评分:与术前相比,两组患者术后1年及末次随访时均较术前明显减小,差异有统计学意义(A组分别为t=2.34、t=2.53,B组分别为t=2.44、t=2.51,P值均<0.05);两组之间各个时间点VAS评分、ODI评分的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).椎间角:A组患者L4~L5术后1年及末次随访时与术前对比,差异有统计学意义(分别为t=2.11、t=2.19,P<0.05);B组患者术后1年及末次随访时与术前相比,椎间角差异有统计学意义(L3~ L4分别为t=2.15、t=2.33,L5~S1分别为t=2.25、t=2.34,P值均<0.05),术前L3~L4、L5~ S1与A组的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).SD:A组L4~L5术后1年及末次随访时与术前相比,差异均无统计学意义(P值均>0.05);B组术后1年和末次随访时与术前相比明显减小,差异有统计学意义(L4~L5分别为t=2.37、t=2.59,L3~L4分别为t=2.44、t=2.61,L5~S1分别为t=2.43、t=2.54,P值均<0.05).结论 Coflex治疗L4~L5Ⅰ度退变性滑脱疗效优良,术后3年以上的随访未发现明显的滑脱进展,相邻节段无明显退变加重. Objective To study the clinical results of Coflex and lumbar posterior decompression and fusion in the treatment of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis at L4-5.Methods Thirty-eight patients with Grade Ⅰ degenerative spondylolisthesis,from January 2008 to December 2011 in Beijing Chaoyang Hospital,Capital Medical University were reviewed,and patients were divided into two groups by randomness.Group A was treated with Coflex and group B with pedicle instrumentation and interbody fusion.Fifteen patients were included in group A,and 23 patients were included in group B.In group A,the average age was (56.3±9.1) years.In group B,the average age was (58.2± 11.2) years.The clinical results were evaluated by visual analogue scale (VAS) and Oswestry disability index (ODI).Slip distance (SD) was measured before and after surgery,and the changes of intervertebral angle at index level and adjacent level were also recorded.Results The follow-up period was 36 to 68 months,with the average of (39±14) months in the both groups.The operation time and bleeding volume of patients in group A were significantly less than that of group B (P〈0.05).In both groups,the difference of ODI and VAS before operation and postoperative follow-up were statistically significant (P 〈 0.05).There was no significant difference between lumbar intervertebral angle and the sliding distance in group A at all time points.In the group B,there was a significant increase in the intervertebral angle and the sliding distance at L3-4 and L5-S1 level after surgery,the difference at upper and below adjacent segment before and after surgery were statistically significant.Conclusions Coflex interspinous dynamic stabilization system has same excellent clinical results as pedicle screw instrumentation and fusion surgery for the treatment of L4-5 degenerative spondylolisthesis;no significant progression of spondylolisthesis been observed during more than 3 years follow-up,and no obvious adjacent segment degeneration has been found.
作者 海涌 孟祥龙 李冬月 张希诺 王云生 Hai Yong Meng Xianglong Li Dongyue Zhang Xinuo Wang Yunsheng(Department of Orthopaedics, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100020, China)
出处 《中华外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2017年第3期208-213,共6页 Chinese Journal of Surgery
关键词 脊椎滑脱 腰椎 内固定器 融合术 Spondylolysis Lumbar vertebrae Internal fixators Fusion
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献27

  • 1Labelle H, Roussouly P, Berthonnaud E, et al. The importance of spino-pelvic balance in LS-S1 developmental spondylolisthesis: a review of pertinent radiologic measurements [ J ]. Spine ( Phila Pa 1976), 2005, 30(6 Suppl) :27-34.
  • 2Taillard WF. Etiology of spondylolisthesis [ J ]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1976 ( 117 ) :30-39.
  • 3Poussa M, Remes V, Lamberg T, et al. Treatment of severe spondylolisthesis in adolescence with reduction or fusion in situ: long-term clinical, radiologic, and functional outcome [ J ]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) , 2006, 31 (5):583-590.
  • 4Dick WT, Schnebel B. Severe spondylolisthesis. Reduction and internal fixation [ J ]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1988, (232) :70-79.
  • 5Matthiass HH, Heine J. The surgical reduction of spondylolisthesis [ J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1986, (203) :34-44.
  • 6Molinari RW, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, et al. Complications in the surgical treatment of pediatric high-grade, isthmic dysplastic spondylolisthesis. A comparison of three surgical approaches [ J ]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 1999,24(16) :1701-1711.
  • 7Petraeo DM, Spivak JM, Cappadona JG, et al. An anatomic evaluation of 1.5 nerve stretch in spondylolisthesis reduction [ J ]. Spine ( Phila Pa 1976), 1996,21 ( 10 ) : 1133-1138.
  • 8Mehdian SM, Arun R, Jones A, et al. Reduction of severe adolescent isthmic spondylolisthesis : a new technique [ J ]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2005,30(19) :E579-584.
  • 9Mehdian SH, Arun R. A new three-stage spinal shortening procedure for reduction of severe adolescent isthmic spondylolisthesis: a case series with medium- to long-term follow- up[J]. Spine (PhilaPa1976), 2011, 36(11):E705-711.
  • 10North American Spine Society. Evidence-based clinicalguidelines for multidisciplinary spine care:diagnosis andtreatment of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis[Z].2011.56-63.

共引文献33

同被引文献34

引证文献7

二级引证文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部