期刊文献+

阿托西班与利托君联合用药与单一用药治疗早产的临床效果比较 被引量:24

Clinical effect comparison of combined therapy of atosiban and ritodrine with single drug therapy for premature
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较阿托西班与利托君联合用药与单一用药治疗早产的临床效果差异。方法将120例先兆早产患者按照随机数字表法分为A、B、C三组各40例。A组患者给予阿托西班单药治疗,B组给予利托君单药治疗。C组给予阿托西班与利托君联合用药,比较三组患者的临床效果、心脏储备功能及新生儿结局差异。结果 C组患者48 h、7d有效率、分娩时孕周以及分娩维持时间与其他两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗后,三组均未发生严重不良反应,B、C两组患者心脏功能差异无统计学意义,但与A组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。C组患者新生儿体重显著高于其他两组,且窒息率显著低于其他两组(P<0.05)。结论阿托西班与利托君联合用药疗效优于单独用药且安全可靠。 Objective To compare the difference in clinical effect between combined therapy of atosiban and ritodrine and sin -gle drug therapy for premature .Methods We randomly divided 120 patients with preterm labor patients into A ,B and C groups ,40 in each group .The group A was treated with atosiban single drug therapy .The group B was treated with ritodrine single drug therapy .The group C was treated with combined therapy of ritodrine and atosiban .The differences in clinical effect ,heart function reserve and neo-natal outcome were compared among the three groups .Results In the group C,efficiency in 48 h and 7d,delivery gestational weeks and delivery sustain duration were significantly better than those in another two groups (P 〈0.05).After treatment,none of the three groups had serious adverse reactions .There were no significant difference in cardiac function between the group B and C patients ,but the difference was statistically significant when compared to the group A (P〈0.05).The neonatal weight was significantly higher and asphyxia rate was significantly lower in the group C than those in another two groups were ( P〈0.05 ) .Conclusion The combined therapy of ritodrine and atosiban is better than single drug therapy .It is safe and reliable .
作者 刘月华 LIU Yue-hua(Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Zhengzhou University, Zhengz~ou 450000, Chin)
出处 《实用医院临床杂志》 2017年第2期64-66,共3页 Practical Journal of Clinical Medicine
关键词 先兆早产 阿托西班 利托君 联合用药 Threatened premature labor Atosiban Ritodrine Drug combination
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献21

  • 1单君,刘海虹.高龄妊娠对母儿的影响159例分析[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2006,22(10):775-776. 被引量:19
  • 2杨慧霞,丁依玲,樊尚荣,马玉燕,时春艳,牟瑞丽,马京梅.早产领域的相关问题[J].现代妇产科进展,2007,16(2):81-92. 被引量:20
  • 3Ku6 P, Lauda6ski P.The effect of combined tocolysis on in vitro uterine contractility in preterm labour [J].Adv Med Sci,2011, 56( 1 ) : 88-94.
  • 4Yaju Y,Nakayama T.Effectiveness and safety of ritodrine hydroehloride for the treatment of preterm labour :a systematic review [ J ].Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf, 2006,15 ( 11 ) : 813-822.
  • 5Kimura M, Kato T, Nohara R, et al.Pulmonary edema complicating ritodrine infusion in a patient with premature labor [J].Intem Med, 2013,52( 1 ) : 155.
  • 6Shim JY, Park YW, Yoon BH, et al.Muhicentre, parallel group, randomised,single-blind study of the safety and efficacy of atosiban versus fitodrine in the treatment of acute preterm labour in Korean women[J].BJOG, 2006, 113( 11 ) : 1228-1234.
  • 7Moutquin JM, Sherman D, Cohen H, et al.Double blind, randomized,cantrolled trial of atosiban and ritodrine in the treatment of preterm labor: a multieenter effectiveness and safety study[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol,2000,182(5) : 1191-1199.
  • 8Hadar E,Melamed N,Aviram A,et al.Effeet of an oxytocin receptor antagonist (atosiban) on uterine electrical activity[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol,2013,209(4) :384.
  • 9Hadar E, Mansur N, Ambar I,et al.Atosiban treatment for preterm labor-financial considerations and savings by implementing clinical guidelines [ J ].Harefuah, 2011,150 (6) : 502-506.
  • 10Shim JY, Park YW, Yoon BH, et al. Muhicentre, parallel group, randomised, single-blind study of the safety and efficacy of atosiban versus ritodrine in the treatment of acute preterm labour in Korean women[J]. BJOG, 2006,113(11) :1228-1234.

共引文献60

同被引文献136

引证文献24

二级引证文献113

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部