摘要
专利侵权警告行为既可能是专利权人行使权利的正当行为,也可能构成诋毁商誉的不正当竞争行为,针对警告行为正当性判定,中国司法实践分歧较大。传统裁判模式以《反不正当竞争法》第14条为依据,围绕侵权警告函的内容是否构成"虚伪事实",采用"过失推定规则",重视法律的逻辑性;近期最高人民法院采用"正当行使权利规则",以"行为目的"作为判断要素,试图平衡当事人利益,强化裁判的政策性效果。这两种规则均有不妥之处,前者未明确反驳过错的范围,导致专利权人承担过高风险;后者对适用正当行使权利的理论依据不足,影响法律适用的确定性。合理的裁判模式,应充分保障专利权人行使权利的途径,又能有效救济被警告者商誉受损。
In recent years, patent infringement warning involved commercial defamations are increasing,the judicial practice is facing new challenges. The traditional judgment mode attached much significance to the logic and certainty of the law; recent case of the Chinese supreme court tried to strengthen the policy effect. Reasonable judgment mode, should fully protect the way to exercise the right of patent, but also can effectively relieve the damage of the patent infringement warning. The article analyzes the attributes of ＂Anti- unfair Competition Law＂, critically analyzes the two ways of judgment mode, and demonstrates the rationality and feasibility of the integration of the judgment thinking in the empirical induction and logical reasoning.
出处
《学术月刊》
CSSCI
北大核心
2017年第3期102-111,共10页
Academic Monthly
基金
中国博士后科学基金(2015M571527)资助
关键词
专利侵权警告
商业诋毁
正当行使权利
注意义务
patent infringement warning, commercial defamation, proper exercise of rights, duty of care
