摘要
传世文献关于成汤灭夏之役的记载既比较零星又互相矛盾。上博楚简《容成氏》的相关记述优于传世文献,但有一个比较关键的字未识。通过拆分及与相关诸字比较,试图将其释作"京",读作"亭",并认定其为"庭"字的通假,进而重构出成汤攻占夏都之后,在最主要的"中庭"举行的"革命大典"。出土文献与考古资料的对读,不仅在一定程度上解决了这一个关键字的释读问题,也对说解二里头一号宫殿的遗迹现象颇有帮助,从而为重构成汤灭夏之役提炼出一段重要史实。
The conquest campaign of the Xia resulted in the first dynastic change in Chinese history. The received texts on this campaign are rare and contradictive. The historical narrative in the unearthed text Rongchengshi is superior to received texts, but unfortunately one of the key characters has not been really interpreted. By deconstructing the character and comparing it with relative ones, I try to interpret it as jing （ 京 ） , read it as ting （ 亭 ） , and see it as a loan character of ting （ 庭 ） , and further reconstruct a Revolution Ceremony after Chengtang occupied the capital of the Xia. This comparison between unearthed text and archaeological data not only resolves the interpretation of the target character, but also helps us to explain the features of Palace I at the Erlitou Site, and finally refines an important historical narrative for the conquest campaign of the Xia.
出处
《华夏考古》
CSSCI
北大核心
2017年第1期126-132,共7页
Huaxia Archaeology
基金
国家社会科学基金一般自选项目"豫北地区夏商时期考古学文化研究"(批准号:16BKG010)的阶段性成果
关键词
容成氏
二里头遗址
中庭
革命大典
Rongchengshi
the Erlitou Site
central courtyard
revolution ceremony
