期刊文献+

中学化学知识“提取困难”成因及教学对策研究 被引量:6

Reasons and Teaching Strategies for "Difficulties in Fetching Knowledge" in High School Chemistry
原文传递
导出
摘要 化学知识“提取困难”归纳为4种表现:不能及时提取相关知识;不能独立提取相关知识;不能准确提取相关知识;不能全面提取相关知识。化学知识“提取困难”的原因有:知识内容不熟悉;知识意义不明确;知识连接不清晰;知识网络不完善;知识情境不真实;知识负迁移效应等。克服知识“提取困难”对策主要包括:优化教学方式,注重学生的知识“输出”;营造真实环境,促进知识迁移;围绕核心概念,建立知识连接;理清知识关系,完善知识网络;精心设计问题,加强自我监控;辨清新旧联系,克服定式干扰等。 This paper expounded four kinds of performances of "difficulties in fetching chem- istry knowledge": students couldn't fetch related knowledge timely, independently, accurately, comprehensively. The reasons were as following: students were unfamiliar with the knowledge contents, not clear to knowledge significance and knowledge links, their knowledge networks were not perfect, knowledge situations were unreal and knowledge was negative transfer and so on. Countermeasures to overcome the difficulties in fetching knowledge mainly included: optimi- zing teaching methods, paying attention to students' knowledge "output"; creating real knowl- edge situations, promoting knowledge transfer; centering around core concepts, establishing knowledge links; clarifying the relationships between knowledge, perfecting knowledge net- works; carefully designing questions, strengthening self-monitoring, distinguishing between the new and the old, overcoming the interference of thinking set and so on.
作者 侯帅 王后雄
出处 《化学教育》 CAS 北大核心 2017年第7期51-54,共4页 Chinese Journal of Chemical Education
关键词 化学知识的提取 教学对策 初中化学 高中化学 知识网络 知识迁移 fetching chemistry knowledge teaching strategy junior high school chemistry senior high school chemistry knowledge network knowledge transfer
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献33

  • 1王磊.高观点 大视野 多角度——“新世纪”版高中化学必修教材的特点及实施情况简介[J].化学教育,2005,26(3):13-17. 被引量:18
  • 2孙夕礼,马春生.新课标三种高中化学必修教材的编写特点分析[J].化学教育,2005,26(7):16-22. 被引量:32
  • 3Karpicke J D, Roediger H L. The critical importance of retrieval for learning[J]. SCIENCE. 2008, 319(5865): 966-968.
  • 4Roediger H L, Karpicke J D.Fast Breaking Papers[DB/OL]. htrp:// sciencewatch.com/dr/fbp/2008/08febfbp/08febfbpRoedigerETAL/, 2008-02-01/2011-12-15.
  • 5Cognition and Learning Laboratory[DB/OL]. http://learninglab. psych.purdue.edu/downloads/Karpicke_Vita.pdf ,2011-09-01/ 2011-12-15.
  • 6Karpicke J D, Blunt J R ketrieval Practice Produces More Learning than Elaborative Studying with Concept Mapping[J]. SCIENCE, 2011, 331(6018): 772-775.
  • 7Karpicke J D, Blunt J R. Response to Comment on "Retrieval Practice Produces More Learning than Elaborative Studying with Concept Mapping"[J]. SCIENCE,2011, 334(6055) :453-c.
  • 8Mintzes J J, Canas A, Coffey J, et al. Comment on "Retrieval Practice Produces More Learning than Elaborative Studying with Concept Mapping"[J]. SCIENCE, 2011, 334(6055):453-d.
  • 9Karpicke J D, Pisoni D B. Using immediate memory span to measure implicit learning[J]. MEMORY & COGNITION, 2004, 32 (6): 956-964.
  • 10Roediger H L, Karpicke J D. The Power of Testing Memory Basic Research and Implications for Educational Practice[J]. PERSPEC TIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2006, 1(3): 181-210.

共引文献144

同被引文献35

引证文献6

二级引证文献70

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部