摘要
目的探讨对比不同临床标本微生物检验的阳性率结果差异。方法定义我院2012年1—12月搜集的92份标本作为A组,另外将2013年1—12月搜集的93例标本作为B组,两组均采用全自动细菌鉴定分析仪严格按照操作标准进行标本检验,对比检验结果差异。结果两组粪便标本、阴道标本对比,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),但是呼吸道标本、血液标本组间对比,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论不同临床标本微生物检验的阳性率结果差异明显,可见当前微生物标本检验工作仍存在一些问题,对此医院要采取措施进行改进,以提高临床诊断水平。
Objective To investigate the difference of positive rate of microbiological examination in different clinical specimens. Methods 92 samples collected from January to December 2012 were selected as group A, and 93 samples collected from January to December 2013 were used as group B, and both groups were treated with fully automatic bacteria Identification of the analyzer in strict accordance with the operating standards for specimen testing, comparative test results differences. Results There was no significant difference between the two groups （P 〉 0.05）, but there was significant difference between the two groups （P 〈 0.05）. Conclusion The positive rate of microbiological examination of different clinical specimens is obviously different. It can be seen that there are still some problems in the current microbiological examination, and the hospital should take measures to improve the clinical diagnosis level.
出处
《中国卫生标准管理》
2017年第6期89-90,共2页
China Health Standard Management
关键词
临床标本
微生物检验
阳性率
clinical specimens
microbiological examination
positive rate
