摘要
《电子商务法》草案送审稿于近日公开征求意见,其第54条第1款规定知识产权权利人应对错误通知承担民事责任。但是,该条款对错误通知的构成要件等尚无具体规定。结合诉前禁令制度以及美国虚假陈述的司法实践,错误通知应当满足特定的构成要件。只要知识产权权利人发出错误通知造成平台内经营者损害,即可推定其存在过错,应当承担民事责任。权利人只有证明其主观善意后方可减免赔偿责任。最后,建议在赔偿范围的认定中借鉴诉前禁令相关制度。通过错误通知制度的构建与细化,有效保护平台内经营者的利益,规制权利人滥用通知的情形。
The Draft Electronic Commerce Law is public to collect comment; Article 54 （1） stipulates that the right holder of intellectual property shall bear civil liability for improper notice. However, the regulation is not specific enough. Based on the the preliminary injunction and the US case law on misrepresentation, the improper notice shall satisfy four elements. The holder is exempt from the liability of damages only if he or she proves the good faith. Some regulations on preliminary injunction can be used to identify the damages for reference. The construction and refinement of the improper notice is conductive to protect the interests of operators within the platform and regulate the abuse of notice.
出处
《电子知识产权》
CSSCI
2017年第3期44-52,共9页
Electronics Intellectual Property
