期刊文献+

经皮椎板间入路内窥镜下减压治疗退变性腰椎管狭窄症的疗效分析 被引量:33

Percutaneus endoscopic interlaminar decompression in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 :评估经皮椎板间入路内窥镜下减压治疗退变性腰椎管狭窄症的临床疗效。方法 :2014年1月~2014年12月采用经皮椎板间入路内窥镜下减压治疗退变性腰椎管狭窄症126例,男82例,女44例;年龄46~83岁(65.8±12.4岁)。L4-5节段狭窄73例,L5-S1节段狭窄53例。术前和术后随访时采用疼痛视觉模拟评分(visual analogue scale,VAS)、Oswestry功能障碍指数(Oswestry disability index,ODI)对患者进行评估,改良Mac Nab评价临床疗效。结果 :126例患者手术均顺利完成,手术时间48~75min(61.4±11.4min),术中透视2~4次(2.4±0.3次),手术切口长约7mm,住院时间3~4d(3.2±0.2d)。术中均未发生硬膜囊撕裂、神经根损伤等并发症。随访24~30个月(26.5±2.1个月),术前和术后1d、1个月、3个月、6个月、12个月、24个月时的腰痛VAS评分分别为4.80±1.46分和3.21±0.75分、1.88±1.15分、1.81±1.05分、0.63±0.62分、0.25±0.15分、0.28±0.12分;腿痛VAS评分分别为7.88±0.81分和2.88±1.45分、2.13±1.02分、1.38±0.62分、0.88±0.62分、0.81±0.54分、0.82±0.23分;术前和术后1个月、3个月、6个月、12个月、24个月时的ODI分别为67.63±9.91和38.4±10.46、26.75±6.88、13.81±5.95、9.19±6.04、9.22±4.56。术后腰腿痛VAS评分及ODI评分与术前比较均有统计学差异(P<0.05)。术后24个月时改良Mac Nab评价疗效优89例,良25例,可12例,优良率为90.5%。结论:经皮椎板间入路内窥镜下减压治疗退变性腰椎管狭窄症创伤小,术中透视少,减压精准彻底,术后恢复快,近期疗效好。 Objectives: To assess the clinical outcomes of percutaneus endoscopic interlaminar decompression in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis(DLSS). Methods: From January 2014 to December 2014, 126 patients with DLSS accepted percutaneus endoscopic interlaminar decompression, including 82 males and 44 females aged from 46-83 years old(average, 65.8±12.4 years). There were 73 patients with stenosis in L4-5 and 53 patients with stenosis in L5-S1. Visual analogue score(VAS), Oswestry disability index(ODI) and modified MacNab were applied to evaluate clinical outcomes before surgery and at the follow-ups. Results: All of the 126 operations had been completed successfully with operation time of 48-75min(61.4±11.4min), 2-4 times(2.4±0.3 times) intraoperative radiation, nearly 7mm incision, 3-4d(3.2±0.2d) hospitalization time, and an average follow-up of 26.5±2.1 months(range, 24-30 months). No complication, such as dural laceration or nerve injury, occurred in operations. Intermittent claudication, lumbocrural pain, decreased sensation, and muscle strength had been improved in different degrees after surgery. All the patients were followed up for 24-30 months(26.5±2.1 months). Before surgery, 1 day, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months after surgery, the waist pain VAS score was 4.80±1.46, 3.21±0.75, 1.88±1.15, 1.81±1.05, 0.63±0.62, 0.25±015, 0.28±0.12 respectively, and leg pain VAS score was 7.88±0.81, 2.88±1.45, 2.13±1.02, 1.38±0.62, 0.88±0.62, 0.81±0.54, 0.82±0.23 respectively. ODI score before surgery, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months after surgery was 67.63±9.91, 38.4±10.46, 26.75±6.88, 13.81±5.95, 9.19±6.04, 9.22±4.56 respectively. Differences in lumbocrural pain scores and ODI scores between pre-operation and post-operation in multi-period were statistically significant(P〈0.05). In the modified MacNab 24 months after surgery, the fineness rate was 90.5%, including 89 cases of excellence, 25 cases of good, and 12 cases of fair. Conclusions: Percutaneus endoscopic interlaminar decompression in DLSS has advantages in limited trauma, short intraoperative radiation exposure time, precise and thorough decompression, and fast recovery after surgery. The short-term outcomes are satisfactory.
作者 王亮 曾建成 宋跃明 谢天航 修鹏 聂鸿飞 蒋虎山 陈康 WANG Liang ZENG Jiancheng SONG Yueming et al(Department of Orthopedics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, China)
出处 《中国脊柱脊髓杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2017年第3期200-206,共7页 Chinese Journal of Spine and Spinal Cord
基金 成都市科技惠民技术研发项目(编号:2015-HM01-00637-SF) 四川大学华西医院学科卓越发展135工程项目(编号:ZY2016204)
关键词 退变性腰椎管狭窄症 微创外科手术 经皮椎板间入路 椎板开窗 内窥镜 Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis Microsurgery Percutaneus endoscopic interlaminar Lamino-tomy
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献17

  • 1Ruetten S, Komp M, Merk H, et al. Use of newly developed instruments and endoscopes: full-endoscopic resection of lumbar disc herniations via the interlaminar and lateral transforaminal approach [J]. J Neurosurg Spine, 2007, 6(6): 521-530.
  • 2Yeung AT. Minimally invasive disc surgery with the Yeung En- doscopic Spine System (YESS)[J]. Surg Technol int, 1999, 8: 267-277.
  • 3Yeung AT, Tsou PM. Posterolateral endoscopic excision for lum- bar disc herniation: surgical technique, outcome, and complica- tions in 307 consecutive cases[J]. Spine, 2002, 27(7): 722-731.
  • 4Ruetten S, Komp M, Godolias G. An extreme lateral access for the surgery of lumbar disc herniations inside the spinal canal using the full -endoscopic uniportal transforaminal approach-technique and prospective results of 463 patients[J]. Spine, 2005, 30(22): 2570-2578.
  • 5Lee SH, Kang BU, Ahn Y, et al. Operative failure of percu- taneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy: a radiologic analysis of 55 cases[J]. Spine, 2006, 31(10): E285-290.
  • 6Choi G, Lee SH, Raiturker PP, et al. Percutaneous endoscop- ic interlaminar discectomy for intracanalicular disc herniations at LS-S1 using a rigid working channel endoscope[J]. Neuro-surgery, 2006, 58(1 Suppl): 0NS59-68; discussion 0NS59-68.
  • 7Wang B, Lu G, Liu W, et al. Full-endoscopic interlaminar approach for the surgical treatment of lumbar disc herniation:the causes and prophylaxis of conversion to open [J]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2012, 132(11): 1531-1538.
  • 8Ebraheim NA, Miller RM, Xu R, et al. The location of the intervertebral lumbar disc on the posterior aspect of the spine [J]. Surg Neurol, 1997, 48(3): 232-236.
  • 9Reulen HD, Muller AD, Ebeling UD. Microsurgical anatomy of the lateral approach to extraforaminal lumbar disc hernia- tions[J]. Neurosurgery, 1996, 39(2): 345-351.
  • 10Hasegawa T, Mikawa Y, Watanabe R, et al. Morphometric analysis of the lumbosacral nerve roots and dorsal root gan- glia by magnetic resonance imaging[J]. Spine, 1996, 21(9): 1005 - 1009.

共引文献51

同被引文献258

引证文献33

二级引证文献156

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部