2Poeze M, Verbruggen JP, Brink PR. The relationship between the out- come of operatively treated calcaneal fractures and institutional frac- ture load. A systematic review of the literature[ J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am,2008,5 : 1013 - 1021.
3Wirtz DC, Pandorf T, Portheine F, et al. Concept and development of an orthotropic FE model of the proximal femur[ J]. J Biomech ,2003, 2:289 - 293.
4Sowmianarayanan S, Chandrasekaran A, Kumar RK. Finite element a- nalysis of a subtrochanteric fractured femur with dynamic hip screw, dynamic condylar screw, and proximal femur nail implants-a compara- tive study [ J ]. Proc Inst Mech Eng H,2008,1 : 117 - 127.
5Levine DS, Helfet DL. An introduction to the minimally invasive os- teosynthesis of intra-articular calcaneal fractures[ J]. Injury,2001,1 : 51 -54.
6Gougoulias N ,Khanna A ,McBride DJ,et al. Management of calcaneal fractures: systematic review of randomized trials [ J ]. Br Med Bull, 2009,92 : 153 - 167.
7Redfern DJ, Oliveira ML, Campbell JT, etal. A biomechanical corn-parison of locking and nonlocking plates for the fixation of calcaneal fractures[ J ]. Foot Ankle Int,2006,3 : 196 - 201.
8Blake MH, Owen JR, Sanford TS,et al. Biomechanical evaluation of a locking and nonlocking reconstruction plate in an osteoporotic ealca- heal fracture model[ J ]. Foot Ankle Int,2011,4:432 - 436.
9Stoffel K, Booth G, Rohrl SM, et al. A comparison of conventional ver- sus locking plates in intraarticular calcaneus fractures: a biomechani- cal study in human cadavers [ J ]. Clin Biomech ( Bristol, Avon ) ,2007,1:100 - 105.
10Melt T, Rammeh S, Drewes T,et al. Stability of locking and non-loc- king plates in an osteoporetic calcaneal fracture model [ J ]. Foot An- kle Int,2011,3:307 -313.