摘要
自《中华人民共和国海事诉讼特别程序法》颁布以来,海事强制令法律性质的论争从未止息。通过海事强制令与相关程序设立宗旨的比较考察,将其定位为独立于行为保全且超越先予执行的紧急审理程序较为妥当。此外,由于海事强制令施行的强制性,《中华人民共和国海事诉讼特别程序法》明确规定了其适用条件。海事法院基于交易的需要以及法伦理性原则,续造了被请求人行为合法及非紧急条件下适用海事强制令的情形,尽管有违前述规定,但因其恪守了司法续造的界限,且有利于司法公正与效率,应予肯定。
Since the promulgation of Special Maritime Procedure Law of the People＇s Republic of China,the controversy over the legal nature of maritime injunction has never ceased. It is appropriate to treat maritime injunction as emergency proceeding which is beyond behavior preservation and advance enforcement by comparison of the legal purpose between maritime injunction and related procedure. In addition,Special Maritime Procedure Law of the People＇s Republic of China specifies the maritime injunction＇s applicable conditions given the fact of its law-enforcement coerciveness. The maritime court applies the maritime injunction in the situation of the requested person＇s lawful conduct and non-emergency,based on the needs of trading and rule of law. Although such practise is inconsistent with aforementioned provisions of law,it should be upheld because it abides by the limits of judicial continuation and is conducive to facilitating judicial efficiency and justice.
出处
《中国海商法研究》
2017年第1期52-59,76,共9页
Chinese Journal of Maritime Law
关键词
海事强制令
行为保全
先予执行
司法续造
maritime injunction
preservation of action
enforcement in advance
judicial continuation
