期刊文献+

滤泡性淋巴瘤国际预后指数2在利妥昔单克隆抗体维持治疗滤泡性淋巴瘤患者中的预后意义 被引量:11

Prognostic Significance of Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index 2(FLIPI2) in Follicular Lymphoma Patients Treated with Rituximab Maintenance
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨滤泡性淋巴瘤国际预后指数2(FLIPI2)在滤泡性淋巴瘤(FL)中的预后意义,以期寻找更适合维持治疗的人群,为个体化治疗进行更深入的探索。方法:对2002年12月至2014年12月以利妥昔单克隆抗体联合环磷酰胺、多柔比星、长春新碱及泼尼松(R-CHOP)化疗方案治疗的140例初治FL患者进行回顾性分析。140例中122例经过治疗后获得缓解,其中56例接受2个月1次利妥昔单克隆抗体维持(RM),中位维持8次(RM组);66例不接受任何抗淋巴瘤药物治疗(non-RM组)。结果:RM组及non-RM组在年龄、性别、病理分级、Ann Arbor分期、FLIPI及FLIPI2评分等临床及病理特征方面均无显著性差异。RM组和non-RM组的2年无进展生存(PFS)分别为89.7%和77.6%(P=0.043),其2年总生存(OS)分别为100%和98.6%(P=0.131)。无论在整体队列、RM组或non-RM组中,FLIPI2均可将患者分为预后显著差异的3个危险组别(P<0.001)。亚组分析显示,FLIPI2低危及中危患者RM组较non-RM组的PFS显著提升;但在FLIPI2高危组中,RM与non-RM组的2年PFS率分别为55.6%和46.9%(P=0.920)。结论:经一线R-CHOP方案治疗缓解的FL患者,无论是否行RM,FLIPI2均对其预后判别具有重要意义。FLIPI2低危及中危患者均可以从RM治疗中获益,但是高危患者中RM治疗的意义仍值得进一步明确。 Objective: To investigate the prognostic significance of Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index 2 (FLIPI2) in FL patients treated with rituximab maintenance. Methods: A tatol of 140 newly diagnosed FL patients who received Rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone (R-CHOP) chemotherapy in our department were retrospectively analyzed from December 2002 to December 2014. Among 140 patients with FL 122 patients achieved response, from them 56 patients received R maintenance (RM) every 2 months for median 8 times ( RM group) while the rest 66 patients did not receive further anti-lymphoma treatment ( non-RM group). Results : There was no statistical difference in age, sex, pathologic grading, staging, FLIPI or FLIPI2 between RM and non-RM groups. The 2 - year progression-free survival ( PFS ) of RM and non-RM groups were 89.7% and 77. 6% (P = 0. 043 ) while the 2 - year overall survival were 100% and 98.6% (P = 0. 131 ). FLIPI2 is a significant prognostic model either in the total cohort, RM or non-RM groups (P 〈0.001 all). In subgroup analysis, RaM was able to decrease disease progression in low and intermediate-risk group of FLIPI2, while the 2 - year PFS of RM and non-RM groups in high-risk group were similar (55. 6% vs 46. 9% )(P=0. 920). Conclusion: FL1PI2 presents robust prognostic significance either in RM or OBS patients, the patients in FLIPI2 low and intermediate-risk group may benefite from RM, but the role of RM in high-risk patients should be further to investigate.
出处 《中国实验血液学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2017年第2期426-430,共5页 Journal of Experimental Hematology
基金 上海市科学技术委员会科研计划(08411953900) 瑞金医院优秀青年教师(800000000003) 上海交通大学晨星青年学者奖励计划 上海市青年医师培养资助计划
关键词 滤泡性淋巴瘤 滤泡性淋巴瘤国际预后指数2 利妥昔单克隆抗体维持 follicular lymphoma follicular lymphoma international prognostic index 2 rituximab maintenance
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献27

  • 1Zelenetz AD,Abramson JS, Advani RH,et al. Non-HodgkinJ slymphomas. J Natl Compr Cane Netw, 2011 ; 9(5) : 484 -560.
  • 2中华医学会血液学分会.中国滤泡淋巴瘤诊断与治疗指南.中作血液学杂志,2011 ;32(10) :717 -720.
  • 3Lee D,Seo J,Oh Y,et al. Analysis of follicular lymphoma bydual-color fluorescence in situ hybridization. Virchows Arch,2008; 452(1) : 75-81.
  • 4Tarella C, Ladetto M, Benedetti F, et al. A recent update of threeconsecutive prospective trials with high-dose therapy and autograft,without or with Rituximab,as primary treatment for advanced-stageFollicular lymphoma ( FL) shows a sizeable group of patientssurviving in continuous complete remission up to 16 years after theend of treatment : should we still consider FL an incurable disease?.Blood (ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts) , 2009; 114: 882.
  • 5Liu Q, Fayad L, Cabanillas F, et al. Improvement of overall andfailure-free survival in stage IV follicular lymphoma : 25 years oftreatment experience at the university of Texas MD AndersonCancer Center. J Clin Oncol, 2006 ; 24( 10) : 1582 - 1589.
  • 6Federico M, Bellei M, Marcheselli L, et al. Follicular lymphomaInternational Prognostic Index 2: A new prognostic index forfollicular lymphoma developed by the International FollicularLymphoma Prognostic Factor Project. J Clin Oncol,2009 ; 27(27): 4555 -4562.
  • 7Najjar IE,Matthews J,Gribben J,et al. Neither the FLIPI nor theFLIPI2 accurately segregates low-risk from intermediate-riskfollicular lymphoma patients in terms of progression-free survival.Blood (ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts),2011 ; 118 : 2663.
  • 8Press OW, Unger JM, LeBlanc ML, et al. A phase III randomizedintergroup trial ( S0016) comparing CHOP plus rituximab withCHOP plus iodine-131 -tositumomab for front-line treatment offollicular lymphoma : Results of subset analyses and a comparisonof prognostic models. ASCO Meeting Abstracts, 2012; 30( 15):8001.
  • 9Nooka AK, Nabhan C, Zhou X,et al. Examination of the foll-icular lymphoma international prognostic index ( FLIPI) in theNational LymphoCare study ( NLCS) : a prospective US patientcohort treated predominantly in community practices Ann Oncol,2013; 24(2) : 441 -448.
  • 10Bachy E, Brice P, Delarue R, et al. Long-term follow-up ofpatients with newly diagnosed follicular lymphoma in the preri-tuximab era : effect of response quality on survival-A study from thegroupe d’ etude des lymphomes de 1’ adulte. J Clin Oncol, 2010;28(5):822 -829.

共引文献15

同被引文献64

引证文献11

二级引证文献27

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部