期刊文献+

药品临床价值评估指标体系的构建研究 被引量:9

Construction Study of Index System to Evaluate the Clinical Value of Drugs
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的对药品临床价值的内涵与构成进行分析,并构建药品临床价值评估的指标体系,为药品临床价值的科学评估提供参考依据。方法参考德国、法国药品临床价值评估的指标,初步构建临床价值指标体系,运用专家访谈与德尔菲问卷调查等方法,统计分析确定指标体系构成与指标权重。结果构建了由临床价值和创新价值2个一级指标及15个二级指标组成的药品临床价值分类指标体系。邀请专家根据背景资料对瑞舒伐他汀、阿托伐他汀和辛伐他汀等他汀类药品通用名进行评分,汇总专家评分结果,确定价值排序,并与德国、法国、英国、美国、韩国、日本的市场均价进行对比分析。结论药品临床价值是确定药品合理价格的国际通行标准。本研究依据药品临床价值分类判断药品价格在同类产品中价值排序的方法可行。部分他汀类药品通用名价格排序不能与其临床价值排序相对应,价格没能反映其价值。背景资料的完整性和真实性直接决定临床价值的分级,需要多方参与提供翔实数据和资料。 OBJECTIVE To analyze the connotation and composition of the clinical value of drugs, and to build the index system for the evaluation of drug' s clinical value, hence to provide references for its scientific evaluation. METHODS We designed the preliminary constructs index system referencingmedicine clinical evaluation indicatorsof German and French firstly. And then the expert interview and Delphi survey were used to analysis to determine the index system and index weight of medicine clinical evaluation. RESULTS The classified index system of the clinical value was established, which was composed of 2 first- grade indexes including clinical value and innovation value and 15 grade two indexes. Experts were invited to assess the value ranking according to the background information of rosuvastatin, atorvastatin and simvastatin statin drugs by their generic names. The expert's scoring results were summarized to determine the sequence. And it were compared with the average market prices in Germany, France, Britain, the United States, South Korea, Japan and analyzed. CONCLUSION The clinical value of drugs is an international standard for determining the reasonable price of drugs. This research method is feasible to determine the drug prices sequencing by the classified clinical value of drugs in the same kind of product. The price sequencing of some generic names of statin drugs did not correspond with its clinical value sequence, and the price can not reflect its value. The integrity and authenticity of the background data directly determine the classification of the clinical value. Various parties are needed to partici-pate in providing detailed data and information.
出处 《中国药学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2017年第8期706-710,共5页 Chinese Pharmaceutical Journal
基金 中国药师协会委托项目"药品临床价值分类研究"项目资助(2015-0-4-092)
关键词 药品临床价值 指标体系 德尔菲法 他汀类药品 药品定价 drug's clinical value index system Delphi method statin drugs drug pricing
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献15

  • 1王锡锌.我国公共决策专家咨询制度的悖论及其克服——以美国《联邦咨询委员会法》为借鉴[J].法商研究,2007,24(2):113-121. 被引量:130
  • 2肖旭东.专家咨询制度与公共决策的科学化民主化[J].辽宁行政学院学报,2007,9(2):39-40. 被引量:7
  • 3KotlerP,ArmstrongG.市场营销原理[M].13版.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2010:288-294.
  • 4杜栋,庞庆华,吴炎.管理科学与工程专业研究生系列教材:现代综合评价方法与案例精选[M].2版.北京:清华大学出版社.2008:11-33.
  • 5Sawtooth Software, Inc. The MaxDiff/Web System Techni- cal Paper[S].2007.
  • 6Tebbi CK.Treatment compliance in childhood and adoles- cence[J]. Cancer, 1993,71 (S 10) : 3 441.
  • 7Renzi C, Picardi A, Abeni D, et al. Association of dissat- isfaction with care and psychiatric morbidity with poor treatment compliance[J]. Arch Dermatol, 2002, 138 (3) : 337.
  • 8Institute for Quality and Efficience in Health Care Fre- quently asked questions ( FAQs ) : external experts [ EB/ OL]. 2014 - 06 - 04] I2014 - 07 - O1 ]. https:// www. iqwig, de/en/participation/contributing_ expert_ knowledge/faqs_for_external_experts. 3247. html.
  • 9RUNGE C. Separating the wheat from the chaff [ J ]. Eur J Health Econ,2012,13:121 - 126.
  • 10RUOF J. Early benefit assessment(EBA) in Germany: analysing decisions 18 months after introducing the new AMNOG legislation [ J ]. Eur J Health Econ,2014, 15(6) :577 -89.

共引文献22

同被引文献92

引证文献9

二级引证文献43

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部