摘要
目的:探讨中文版行为抑制-激活系统量表(BIS-BAS)在中国文化背景下的信度及效度。方法:按照量表的翻译程序,将BIA-BAS量表翻译成中文后再回译成英文,与原量表进行比较后再次进行修改;使用修改后的BIS-BAS量表对贵阳市2所大学和3所中学共2 000名12~24岁的中国学生进行测评;回收有效问卷1 807份,其中对717份问卷进行探索性因素分析,对1 090份问卷进行验证性分析、信度和效度分析。结果:中文版BIA-BAS量表共22个条目,探索性因子分析提取4个因素,累计贡献率为49.38%;量表的内容效度指数(SCVI)为0.91,各个条目的内容效度指数(I-CVI)为0.82~1.0;验证性因子分析显示量表的总体拟合情况良好(RMSEA=0.06,GFI=0.93,AGFI=0.91,IFI=0.86,CFI=0.86,TLI=0.84);BIS-BAS总量表的内部一致性系数为0.79,重测信度为0.80,各个分量表的内部一致性系数为在0.52~0.73。结论:中文版BIS-BAS量表用于12~24岁中国学生具有较好的信度和效度。
Objective： To investigate the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the BIS- BAS Scale under Chinese cultural translated into Chinese. Then the background. Methods： The original version of the BIS-BAS was Chinese version was translated back to English and then compared with the original scale and revise it. A total of 2 000 12 to 24 years old students were evaluated and a total of 1 807 valid questionnaires were collected, which were used for exploratory factor analysis （ n = 717 ）, confirmatory factor analysis and reliability and validity analysis （n = 1 090）. Results： The Chinese version of BIS-BAS has been consisted of 22 items and 4 items are interference. Four factors were extracted by factor analysis which could explain 49.38% of the total variance. The scale content validity index （S-CVI） was 0.91, and the item content validity index （I-CVI） ranged from 0.82 to 1.0. The result of confirmatory factor analyses （ RMSEA = 0.06, GFI = O. 93, AGFI = 0.91, IFI = 0.86, CFI = 0.86, TLI = 0.84） indicated that the four-factor structure of the BIS-BAS was suitable for the Chinese sample. Cronbach＇s reliability coefficients were 0.79 for BIS-BAS. The test-retest reliability coefficient was 0.80 and the mean inter-item correlation coefficient for the factors ranged from 0.53 to 0.73. Conclusion： Chinese version of BIS-BAS scale for 12 to 24 years old Chinese students have good reliability and validity.
出处
《贵州医科大学学报》
CAS
2017年第4期426-430,共5页
Journal of Guizhou Medical University
基金
贵州省科技厅科研基金[黔人项目资助合同(2015)06号]
关键词
心理学
实验
量表
行为抑制系统
行为激活系统
信度
效度
学生
psychology, experinental
scale
behavioral inhibition system
behavioral activation sys- tem
reliability
validity
students
