期刊文献+

Conversion between solid and beam element solutions of finite element method based on meta-modeling theory:development and application to a ramp tunnel structure 被引量:1

Conversion between solid and beam element solutions of finite element method based on meta-modeling theory:development and application to a ramp tunnel structure
下载PDF
导出
摘要 In this study, a new method for conversion of solid finite element solution to beam finite element solution is developed based on the meta-modeling theory which constructs a model consistent with continuum mechanics. The proposed method is rigorous and efficient compared to a typical conversion method which merely computes surface integration of solid element nodal stresses to obtain cross-sectional forces. The meta-modeling theory ensures the rigorousness of proposed method by defining a proper distance between beam element and solid element solutions in a function space of continuum mechanics. Results of numerical verification test that is conducted with a simple cantilever beam are used to find the proper distance function for this conversion. Time history analysis of the main tunnel structure of a real ramp tunnel is considered as a numerical example for the proposed conversion method. It is shown that cross-sectional forces are readily computed for solid element solution of the main tunnel structure when it is converted to a beam element solution using the proposed method. Further, envelopes of resultant forces which are of primary importance for the purpose of design, are developed for a given ground motion at the end. In this study, a new method for conversion of solid finite element solution to beam finite element solution is developed based on the meta-modeling theory which constructs a model consistent with continuum mechanics. The proposed method is rigorous and efficient compared to a typical conversion method which merely computes surface integration of solid element nodal stresses to obtain cross-sectional forces. The meta-modeling theory ensures the rigorousness of proposed method by defining a proper distance between beam element and solid element solutions in a function space of continuum mechanics. Results of numerical verification test that is conducted with a simple cantilever beam are used to find the proper distance function for this conversion. Time history analysis of the main tunnel structure of a real ramp tunnel is considered as a numerical example for the proposed conversion method. It is shown that cross-sectional forces are readily computed for solid element solution of the main tunnel structure when it is converted to a beam element solution using the proposed method. Further, envelopes of resultant forces which are of primary importance for the purpose of design, are developed for a given ground motion at the end.
出处 《Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration》 SCIE EI CSCD 2017年第2期297-309,共13页 地震工程与工程振动(英文刊)
关键词 meta-modeling theory finite element method solid and beam element models continuum mechanics structural mechanics meta-modeling theory finite element method solid and beam element models continuum mechanics structural mechanics
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献21

  • 1Ady A, Mackie RK and Bozidar S (2008), “Guidelines for Nonlinear Analysis of Bridge Structures in California,” PEER Report 2008/03, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Centre, College of Engineering, University of California, Berkeley.
  • 2AASHTO (2004), Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials Inc, Washington, DC.
  • 3California Department of Transportation (CALTRANS) Seismic Design Criteria: Version 1. 2. Str. 121, December, 2001.
  • 4EERI, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute (1989), Loma Prieta Earthquake October 17, 1989, Preliminary Reconnaissance Report, E.E.R.I.89-03, November.
  • 5Eberhard MO, De la Colina J and Ryter SW (1995), “Seismic Vulnerability of the Alaskan way Viaduct” WSDOT Typical Unit Report No.WA-RD363.1. Washington State Department of Transportation, Olympia, Wa.
  • 6Mander JB, Priestley MJN and Park R (1988), “Theoretical Stress-strain Model for Confined Concrete,” Journal of the Structural Engineering, 114(ST8): 1804—1826.
  • 7Mazzoni S and Moehle JP ( 2001), “Seismic Response of Beam-column Joints in Double Deck Reinforced Concrete Bridge Frames,” ACI Structural Journal, 98(3): 259-269.
  • 8Ministry of Transportation of the People’s Republic of China (MTPRC) (2008), Guidelines for Seismic Design of Highway Bridges (GSDHB), JTG/T B02-01-2008,China Communications Press, Beijing, China.
  • 9Paulay T and Priestley MJN (1992), “Seismic Design of Reinforced Concrete and Masonry Buildings,” Wiley Interscience, New York, USA.
  • 10Priestley MJN, Seible F and Chai YH ( 1989), “Collapse of the Cypress Viaduct,” Final Report to the Caltrans Office of Structural Design.

共引文献6

同被引文献1

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部