摘要
体育竞赛不能作为著作权法中的"作品"来保护,因为其不符合作品的构成要件,同时用著作权予以保护还严重违背体育竞技的基本精神。但"表演者权"制度可以用来保护竞技者,这既符合著作权的基本法理,又与体育比赛的竞技精神不谋而合,同时还有利于解释"体育赛事转播权"的法权来源,因此该做法可谓"一石多鸟",殊值我国立法和司法理论加以借鉴和运用。
Sports games can＇t be protected as ＂work＂ under Copyright Law because it does not constitute the 〈6 work,5 as stipulated in the Copyright Law. Meanwhile, copyright protection seriously violates the spirit of athletic contest. However, the performer 5s right could be used to protect athletes. It conforms to the legal theory of copyright, and also coincides with the spirit of athletic contest. So, this practice ＂kills two birds with one stone＂ and is really instructive.
出处
《知识产权》
CSSCI
北大核心
2017年第5期61-65,共5页
Intellectual Property
基金
西南政法大学校级科研项目<体育赛事转播的知识产权法律问题研究>(编号为:2016XZQN-05)的阶段性成果
关键词
体育比赛
著作权保护之批判
表演者权保护的证立
权源分析
sports games
criticism of copyright protection
justification of the protection of performer＇s right
original right analysis
