摘要
北京市夏季高温将对猪的生产造成严重影响,夏季猪舍环境温度控制尤为重要。该试验研究比较了湿帘-风机和单纯风机在北京猪舍的降温效果,设计了风机风量测量系统并实测了猪舍通风量,每天定时分别测定两猪舍内温度、湿度、风速和舍外温、湿度并进行比较分析。结果表明:试验期间,湿帘-风机猪舍和单纯风机舍6个断面风速范围分别为0.51~0.84和0.51~0.68 m/s,整体风速差异不显著(P>0.05)。湿帘-风机舍舍内温度显著低于单纯风机舍(P<0.05),湿帘-风机舍和单纯风机舍舍内温度高于30.0℃的小时数占比分别为5.0%和20.2%。湿帘-风机舍同一时刻断面1(湿帘端)温度低于断面6(风机端)温度0.4~2.2℃,单纯风机舍各时刻不同断面的温度差异不显著(P>0.05)。单纯风机舍内的猪只呼吸频率均显著高于湿帘-风机舍内呼吸频率3.82次/min(12:00)和3.05次/min(14:00)(P<0.05)。湿帘-风机舍降温系统日用水量为1.20~6.27 m^3。北京地区猪舍使用湿帘-风机系统降温效果优于单纯风机降温效果,但湿帘-风机降温将耗用一定水资源。
High temperature in summer will cause serious impact on the production performance of pigs. So it is very important to control temperature in the pig houses in Beijing, China. An experiment was conducted to compare the cooling effect of the water pad-fan and only fan in pig house in Beijing from July 24 th to August 11 th, 2015. Before testing the cooling effect, a manual test system for measuring fan ventilation rate was designed and applied to check if the ventilation rate of the experimental pig houses was appropriate. The water pad-area for the experimental pig house was checked too. A total of 188 finishing pigs（each pig 100-110 kg） were prepared for the experiment and divided into 2 pig houses averagely. Temperature and relative humidity outside the pig houses and temperature, relative humidity and wind speed at 6 sections in the pig houses were monitored. The results showed that the ventilation rate and water pad-area were up to the standard recommended by ＂Midwest Plan Service Structures and Environment Handbook＂. During the experimental period, the wind speed range at Section 1-6 in the water pad-fan pig house and the fan pig house was 0.51-0.84 and 0.51-0.68 m/s, respectively. There was insignificant difference between the water pad-fan pig house and the fan pig house for whole wind speed（P〈0.05）. The water pad-fan system could reduce the temperature inside the pig house by 12.3 ℃ at most compared to the temperature outside while the fan system could reduce the temperature inside the pig house by 7.6 ℃ compared to the temperature outside in the same experimental period. But when the temperature and relative humidity outside the pig houses were 36.5 ℃ and 60.1%, respectively, the water pad-fan system could not control the temperature inside the pig house below 31.7 ℃. During the 450 h experimental period, the time percentage for the water pad-fan pig house and fan pig house with indoor temperature of below 28.0 ℃ was 71.6% and 61.8%, respectively, and that above 30.0 ℃ was 5.0% and 20.2%, respectively. The temperature at Section 1 was 0.4-2.2 ℃ lower than that at Section 6 in the water pad-fan pig house while the temperature difference at different sections in the fan pig house was not significant（P〉0.05）. The relative humidity difference at different sections both in the water pad-fan pig house and in the fan pig house was not significant（P〉0.05）. Respiration rates in the water pad-fan pig house were reduced by 3.82 bpm（breaths per minute） at 12：00 and 3.05 bpm at 14：00 compared to those in the fan pig house（P〈0.05）, and respiration rate was affected by temperature（P〈0.05）. Being one kind of evaporative cooling method, the water pad-fan system would consume 1.20-6.27 m-3 water per day during the days with good cooling effect and the temperature was reduced by 4.0-12.3 ℃ compared to the temperature outside the pig houses. The temperature range reduced was not consistent with the water consumption at all time because the relative humidity was not the same in different days. These results indicate that the water pad-fan cooling system is better than the fan cooling system in pig houses in Beijing, China.
出处
《农业工程学报》
EI
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2017年第7期197-205,共9页
Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering
基金
生猪产业技术体系北京市创新团队项目(BAIC02-2016)
关键词
风机
降温
风速
湿帘-风机系统
猪舍
fans
cooling
wind speed
water pad-fan system
pig house
