摘要
目的 对多媒体视觉训练系统与传统方法治疗儿童弱视的临床效果进行比较.方法 选取弱视患儿56例作为研究对象,按照随机分配原则将患儿分成参照组和研究组,各28例.其中,参照组患眼46只,采用传统遮盖法进行治疗,研究组患眼45只,采用多媒体视觉训练系统进行治疗.观察并对比两组患儿的临床疗效.结果 研究组患儿的总有效率为88.89%,明显高于参照组的71.74%,差异有统计学意义（x2=4.21,P＜0.05）.经过治疗后,研究组患儿的视觉诱发电位水平为潜时（90.75±7.92）ms,振幅（16.48±3.82）μV,视力为（1.07±0.20）;参照组相应值为潜时（102.69±11.63）ms,振幅（10.52±3.14）μV,视力为（0.76±0.14）,研究组均显著优于参照组,差异均有统计学意义（t=2.79、3.02、3.02,均P＜0.05）.结论 相较于传统遮盖疗法,多媒体视觉训练系统在儿童弱视的临床治疗中具有更为优越的治疗效果,值得广泛推广.
Objective To compare the clinical effects of multimedia visual training system and traditional methods in the treatment of children with amblyopia.Methods 56 children with amblyopia were selected as the research subjects.According to the principle of random distribution, the children were divided into the control group and the study group.Among them,46 eyes of the control group were treated with the traditional cover method, and the study group was treated with multimedia visual training system for the treatment of 45 eyes.The clinical efficacy of the two groups was observed and compared.Results The total effective rate of the study group was 88.89%,which was significantly higher than that of the control group, and the difference was statistically significant（x2=4.21,P〈0.05）.After treatment, the level of visual evoked potentials in the study group for the latency （90.75±7.92）ms, the amplitude （16.48±3.82）μV,vision acuity（1.07 ±0.20）;the corresponding values of control group were the latency （102.69±11.63）ms, the amplitude （10.52±3.14）μV, visual acuity （0.76±0.14）, those of the study group were significantly better than the control group, and the differences were statistically significant（t=2.79,3.02,3.02,all P〈0.05）.Conclusion Compared with the traditional occlusion therapy, multimedia visual training system has better therapeutic effect in the clinical treatment of amblyopia in children.
出处
《中国基层医药》
CAS
2017年第11期1681-1684,共4页
Chinese Journal of Primary Medicine and Pharmacy
关键词
弱视
儿童
治疗结果
Amblyopia
Child
Treatment Outcome
