摘要
通过对现有《著作权法》及《专利法》的适用与解释完全可以解决3D打印所涉及的知识产权相关问题。在著作权领域,3D打印中的CAD文档由于具备独创性,完全可以构成"图形作品",因而未经许可上传CAD文档的行为,网络服务商可以依据"通知—移除"规则豁免。同时,由于反向工程具有正当性,因此通过该种方式实现的与他人相同的CAD文档也不应被禁止。在专利领域,CAD文档本身并不具备可专利性。利用CAD文档打印实物的行为属于专利法意义上的"制造",通过CAD文档制造其他专利产品的行为属于"使用",而仅仅销售专利产品的CAD文档不构成"销售"。通过网络擅自传播他人现有专利权的CAD文档可能构成间接侵权,且仅以"为个人目的"并不能构成专利侵权的豁免事由。
Through the application and interpretation of the existing Copyright Law and the Patent Law, we can solve the problem of intellectual property related to 3D printing. In the field of copyright, CAD documents in 3D printing have originality which can form'graphic works'. And thus unauthorized upload of CAD documents, the network service provider can be exempted according to the'notice-remove'rule. At the same time,because the reverse engineering is justified, the same CAD document as others should not be banned. In the field of patents, the CAD document itself does not have the patentability. The behavior of using CAD documents to print the object is'manufacturing'in the Patent Law; the behavior of using CAD documents to make other patent products 'using'in the Patent Law; and only selling CAD documents with patented product does not constitute 'sales'. The dissemination of CAD document with others' patents through the network may constitute indirect infringement and 'for personal purposes'does not constitute the exemption of patent infringement.
出处
《天津法学》
2017年第2期65-72,共8页
Tianjin Legal Science
关键词
3D打印
著作权
专利权
间接侵权
3D printing
copyright
patent right
indirect infringement
