摘要
面对后现代工业社会带来的挑战以及各党派之间的不断博弈,以家庭友好著称的北欧家庭政策近年不断受到关于可持续性的质疑。文章比较了挪威、瑞典、芬兰和丹麦四国自20世纪70年代以来的政策驱力、家庭政策以及政策效果的异同。分析结果表明北欧各国仍保持了较为稳定的社会民主主义的家庭福利道路,但这种北欧模式也渐趋呈现出多样性。瑞典是最稳定的社会民主主义模式支持者;芬兰因家庭照料补贴与公共照料服务的共存显露出双轨模式的痕迹;挪威促进婚姻的政策上更为超前;而丹麦则发展了更综合的家庭照料补贴金额计算方式。这些多样化的趋向反映了政策对国家背景的敏感性,也启示在设计我国家庭政策体系时考虑我国的历史、文化传统、社会制度和发展现状。
With the continuing parties＇ competition and new challenges in post- industrial societal, Nordic family institutions, famous for the ＂family-friendly policies＂, have been questioning about the sustainability. The researchcompares the similarities and differences in Norway, Sweden, Finland and Denmark, from driving forces, family institutions and outcomes perspectives. The analysis results demonstrateNordic countries are still heading the social democratic path, but this Nordic model gradually reflects morevarieties. Sweden insists on the most stable social domestic regime; Finland indicates the signal of the ＂two-edged＂ policy, where home care allowance and public childcare service coexist; in Norway, the marriage targeting policy is more advanced; and Denmark develops its own calculation of home care allowance. The variety indicates the respects on contexts, and implicates the essence of our history, culture, social institution in designing the family regime in China.
出处
《社会福利》
2017年第4期22-29,共8页
Social Welfare
关键词
家庭政策
北欧国家
福利模式
Family Policy
Nordic Countries
Welfare regime
