期刊文献+

血小板平均体积及D二聚体检测在肺栓塞的价值 被引量:5

Clinical Significance of Mean Platelet Volume and D-dimer Detection in Patients with Pulmonary Embolism
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的目的探讨血小板平均体积(MPV)联合血浆D二聚体(D-D)检测在肺栓塞(PE)中的价值。方法回顾性分析184名被确诊为PE的患者以及100名门诊体检对照者的MPV及D-D联合检测在PE中的应用价值。结果本研究对PE组及对照组临床参数进行比较,发现吸烟比例、MPV及血浆D-D水平等PE组比对照组明显升高,差异有显著性(P<0.05);对PE中影响因素进行多因素Logistic回归分析显示MPV及血浆D-D是PE的独立危险因素;本研究还对MPV及血浆D-D单项检测与联合检测敏感性及特异性进行比较,联合检测结果真阳性率(χ~2=38.18,P=0.031)、真阴性率(χ~2=56.02,P=0.012)均具有统计学意义。结论血常规检查中的MPV联合血浆D-D检测在PE中一定的诊断价值,可作为PE筛选指标。 Objective To investigate the diagnostic importance of mean platelet volume (MPV)and D- dimer(D-D) on pulmonary embolism (PE). Methods Subjects were selected from patients admitted to department of cardiology with clinically confirmed PE and control group selected from people with medical examination, Clinical Data including MPV and D- D were collected for each people. Results A total of 284 cases were analyzed, including 184 patients in PE group and 100 people in the control group, Ratio of smokers, MPV and D-D level in the PE group was significantly higher than in the control group (P 〈 0. 05 ) ;In multivariate logistic regression analysis, MPV and D-D level were found to be independent predictors of PE. Combine with MPV and D-D level compared with one of them,Combine method true positive(χ2 = 38.18 ,P = 0. 031 ) , true negative ( χ2 = 56.02, P = 0. 012 ) is a significant comparative difference. Conclusion Combination with MPV and D-D is a helpful method for the diagnosis of PE.
出处 《血栓与止血学》 2017年第3期421-423,427,共4页 Chinese Journal of Thrombosis and Hemostasis
关键词 肺栓塞 血小板平均体积 D二聚体 Pulmonary embolism Mean platelet volume D- dimer
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献85

  • 1胡大一,张鹤萍,孙艺红,姜立清.华法林与阿司匹林预防非瓣膜性心房颤动患者血栓栓塞的随机对照研究[J].中华心血管病杂志,2006,34(4):295-298. 被引量:162
  • 2邹治鹏,何建国,程显声,赵彦芬,陈白屏,高莹,熊长明,倪新海,荆志诚.230例急性肺动脉血栓栓塞症患者对症治疗、抗凝治疗和溶栓治疗的住院转归[J].中国循环杂志,2006,21(3):219-221. 被引量:27
  • 3Righini M, Van Es J, Den Exter P L, et al. Age-adjusted D- dimer cutoff levels to rule out pulmonary embolism: the ADJUSTPE study [J]. JAMA, 2014, 311 (11) : 1117-1124.
  • 4Chen C, Li G, Liu YD, et al. A new D-dimer cutoff value to improve the exclusion of deep vein thrombosis in cancer patients [J]. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 2014, 15 (4) : 1655-1658.
  • 5Ercan S, Ozkan S, Y uce! N, et al. Establishing reference intervals for D-dimer to trimesters [J]. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 2014, 8(25): 1-5.
  • 6Dubin R, Cushman M, Folsom AR, et al. Kidney function and multiple hemostatic markers: cross sectional associations in the multi-ethnic study ofatherosclerosis[J]. BMC Nephrol, 2011,12 (1) : 3.
  • 7Ma YC, Zuo L, Chen JH, et al. Modified glomerular filtration rate estimating equation for Chinese patients with chronic kidney disease[J]. J Am Soc Nephrol, 2006, 17( 10): 2937-2944.
  • 8Douma RA, Ie Gal G, Sohne M, et al. Potential of an age adjusted D-dimer cut-off value to improve the exclusion of pulmonary embolism in older patients: a retrospective analysis of three large cohorts [J]. BMJ, 2010, 340: c1475.
  • 9Konstantinides SV, Torbicki A, Agnelli G, et al. 2014 ESC guidelines on the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism [J]. Eur Heart J, 2014, 35 (43) : 3033-3069.
  • 10Karami-Djurabi R, Klok FA, Kooiman J, et al. D-dimer testing in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism and impaired renal function [J]. Am J Med, 2009, 122 (11) : 1050-1053.

共引文献664

同被引文献36

引证文献5

二级引证文献52

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部