摘要
侵权责任因果关系理论建立在"事实因果关系"和"法律因果关系"二元论的基础之上,但于此基础之上的因果关系判定无论在理论层面还是司法实务层面都存在一定困境。因果关系从归责要件体系上看,应当维持其事实层面的判断,因果关系理论不必进行"二元论"划分,仅事实上因果关系足矣,法律因果关系的法价值和政策判断交由违法性要件判断、过错的认定以及损害等其他要件来承担限制责任范围、截取因果关系链条的任务更为合适。
The theory of causality in tort liability law is based on a dualism of ＂cause in fact＂ and ＂legal cause＂. But the dualism makes the cognizance of causation in practical cases and the theory of tort law more difficult. In the constituents of tort liability, causality must just keep the fact judgment. The causality can＇ t be divided into two parts, the cause in fact is quiet enough for the theory of causality. As for the mission of legal policy judgments, the component of irregularity and the judgments of fault in the theory of tort liability can realize law value of limiting the liability and intercepting causal chain.
出处
《北华大学学报（社会科学版）》
2017年第3期111-116,共6页
Journal of Beihua University(Social Sciences)
基金
中央民族大学2017年"青年学术团队引领计划"项目"民法总则制定与商事立法疑难问题研究"的阶段性研究成果
关键词
侵权责任
因果关系
过错
法政策
Tort liability
Cause in fact
Fault
Legal policy
