发展级联:解释个体纵向发展的新视角被引量：4

Developmental cascades:A new perspective for uncovering individual longitudinal development

下载PDF

导出

摘要发展级联(developmental cascades)近年来已成为发展心理学追踪研究中一种重要的理论视角。其基本观点是:人的发展过程是一个诸多发展特征不断产生级联效应的过程,某个时间点上个体特征的发展状况会对该特征的后续发展产生影响,并影响其他领域的发展,进而影响到个体的整个发展进程。在发展级联的理论观点基础上形成的相关方法学模型,为探究发展系统中多个因素之间的纵向关联提供了方法学依据与指导。本文介绍了发展级联的相关概念、理论基础、主要观点以及相关的方法学问题,并对其在实证研究中的应用进行了展望。 Developmental cascades have become a new theoretical perspective and a study design strategy for developmental research in recent years. Development is conceptualized as a process of persistent cascade effects among various developmental factors over time. Specifically, developmental cascades postulate that the development level of a certain factor at a particular time point will affect subsequent development of its own, and will spill over to influence development of other domains as well. As a result, the entire follow-up processes of individual development are influenced. Researchers developed statistic models according to the theoretical rationales of the developmental cascades. These statistical models provide methodological guidelines for investigating longitudinal associations among multiple factors in developmental systems. This literature review introduced the development cascades in terms of the related concepts, theoretical basis and rationale, and the methodological issues, and was concluded with insights for the future research.

作者李腾飞陈光辉纪林芹张文新

机构地区山东师范大学心理学院

出处《心理科学进展》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2017年第6期980-988,共9页 Advances in Psychological Science

基金国家社会科学基金项目(15CSH019) 国家自然科学基金项目(31271105)资助

关键词发展级联级联效应交叉滞后面板模型追踪研究 developmental cascades cascade effects cross-lagged panel modeling longitudinal study

分类号 B844 [哲学宗教—发展与教育心理学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献1

1张文新,陈光辉.发展情境论——一种新的发展系统理论[J].心理科学进展,2009,17(4):736-744. 被引量：82

二级参考文献30

1谷传华,张文新.情境的心理学内涵探微[J].山东师范大学学报（人文社会科学版）,2003,48(5):99-102. 被引量：40
2叶浩生.(1998).西方心理学历史受与体系.北京:人民教育出版社.
3Bateson, P., Barker, D., Clutton-Brock, T., Deb, D., D'Udine, B., Foley, R. A., et al. (2004). Developmental plasticity and human health. Nature, 430, 419-421.
4Blok, H., Fukkink, R., Gebhardt, E., & Leseman, P. (2005). The relevance of delivery mode and other programme characteristics for the effectiveness of early childhood intervention. International Journal of Behavioral Development,1, 35-47.
5Bostanci, A. (2006). Two drafts, one genome? Human diversity and human genome research. Science as Culture, 3, 183-198.
6Brim, O. G. Jr., & Kagan, J. (1980). Constancy and change. In O. G. Brim, Jr., & J. Kagan (Eds.), Constancy and change in human development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
7Bronfcnbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development. Cambridge, MA: Havard University Press.
8Eccles, J. S., & Lord, S., & Buchanan, C. M. (1996). School transitions in early adolescence: What are we doing to our young people? In J. A., Graber, J. Brooks-Gunn, & A. C. Petersen (Eds.), Transitions through adolescence (pp. 251-284). Mahwah, NJ: Erbaum.
9Fisher, R., Fabricant, M., & Simmons, L. (2004). Understanding contemporary university-community connections: Context, practice, and challenges. Journal of Community Practice, 12, 13-34.
10Furman, R., Jackson, R. L., Downey, E. E, & Shears, J. (2003). Social constructivist practice with youth. Child & Adolescent Social Work Journal, 4, 263-275.