摘要
债权作为重要财产,以自由让与为原则。债权让与的性质为处分行为,让与人须对让与债权享有处分权,且被让与债权应当满足特定化要求。由于债权脱胎于特定主体之间的关系,它仍有可能由于合同性质、法律规定而不得让与。前者多出于债权内容或基础关系的原因,后者则多以社会政策等公法因素为基础。当事人通过约定禁止债权让与,更是常见。禁止让与约定若仅在合同当事人之间发生债法上的约束力,债权的流通能力才能在最大限度上得以发挥。债权让与仅使被转让的债权移转于受让人,让与人仍享有基础关系的当事人地位。受让人获得与行使债权相关的权利,并承担相应的附随义务。
Claims can be freely ceded,because it becomes an important asset.Assignment is a disposal transaction,so the assignor should be entitled to the claims.Furthermore,the assigned claims must meet the specific requirements.As the claims are derived from the relationship between the particular subjects,due to the nature of contract or regulation of law,claims still cannot be assigned.The reasons for non-transfer may arise from claims or underlying relationships,or social policies.The parties often agree to prohibit the assignment of claims.It is stated that the exclusion or limitation of the assignment of claims is a limitation of the content of the claim,which makes the claim lose its ability to transfer.The doctrines of relative effectiveness and distinction will also hinder the liquidity of the claims to a certain extent.If the Anti-Assignments clauses are only binding between the parties to the contract,the liquidity of the claims can be maximized.Although the assignment leads to the transfer of claims to the assignee,the assignor still holds the status of the contract party.The assignee obtains the rights associated with the exercise of the claim and assumes the corresponding obligations.
出处
《法学家》
CSSCI
北大核心
2017年第3期157-174,共18页
The Jurist
关键词
债权让与
自由让与
特定化
禁止让与约定
Assignment
Free Assignment
Specification
Anti-Assignments Clauses
