摘要
本文以通领科技集团有限公司与美国断路器企业的知识产权纠纷为案例,分析中美两国在国际贸易中的专利保护制度差异。研究发现美国在进口环节设置的337调查作为一种准司法制度,有效弥补了专利司法保护国际贸易领域的缺点,其实质是保护美国国内产业,具有"防火墙"的功能。比较而言,中国针对专利侵权的行政保护力度弱,未能真正发挥对司法制度的补充作用,同时本土企业在国际贸易中缺少有针对性并行之有效的专利维权渠道。本文认为,在整体上提高我国专利行政保护力度的前提下,有必要针对国内和国际贸易这两个不同领域的特点,构建有差异的专利行政保护体系。
Based on the case study of inte}lectu~ property dispute among China＇ s Tollea Group Co. and the United States＇ circuit breaker enterprises, we analyzed two countries＇ patent protection systems in international trade. We found that the 337 investigation, which is a special quasi-judicial institution used in the United States＇ import and export links, acts as a great supplement to the judicial protection in international trade. The essence of 337 investigations is to protect the domestic industry in the United States and has the function of the ＂fire wall＂. However, comparatively speaking, the power of administrative protection aimed at patent infringements in China＇ s is quite weak, so that is not qualified enough to make a complementation to the judicial system. As a result, the China＇ s domestic enterprise cannot find an effective way to protect their patent right and is in an inferior position in international competition. Therefore, we suggest China establish different patent administrative protection systems applied respectively in inland China and international trade, under the premise of generally improving the patent administration protection in our country.
出处
《中国软科学》
CSSCI
CSCD
北大核心
2017年第6期21-30,共10页
China Soft Science
基金
清华大学自主科研项目"中国重大科技创新的社会研究:案例分析与理论探索"(20141081191)
关键词
专利保护
国际贸易
337调查
案例研究
制度差异
patent protection
international trade
337 investigations
comparative study
institutional differences
