摘要
美国1980年颁布的《拜杜法案》赋予政府机构强制项目承担者向第三方授权或许可发明专利的权力,即介入权。自法案颁布以来,有五个介入权申请的典型案例,但均未成功。为保障政府资助发明在商业化中的公众利益,美国学者认为,需要通过立法改革来平衡介入权的体系设计。这些改革措施包括:设置申诉程序;规定被许可者付出"最大努力"并定期报告;明确《拜杜法案》中的"合理条件";通过公开招标强制许可发明专利。本文借鉴美国介入权立法和改革经验,以期对中国《科技进步法》的进一步完善提供新思路。
The Bayh-Dole Act of 1980 in the United Sates grants federal agencies the power to force the recipients of federal research funding to license the resulting inventions to third parties. There have been five significant march-in petitions since the Bayh-Dole Act was implemented, but each petition was failed. American scholars believe that a few reforms to the system could help balance the march- in system＇s design and protect the public interest. Reforms include instituting an appeal process, mandating a duty of ＂best efforts＂ to commercialize subject inventions and report on those efforts, clarifying the meaning of the Bayh-Dole act＇s ＂reasonable terms＂ require- ment, and mandating auctions for licenses on subject inventions. This article drew lessons from the experience of legislation and reform of the Bayh-Dole march-in rights to provide new ideas for the further improvement of China＇s Science and Technology Law.
出处
《中国科技论坛》
CSSCI
北大核心
2017年第7期169-175,共7页
Forum on Science and Technology in China
基金
四川省知识产权教育与培训(交大)基地"高校知识产权法律保护研究"(IP0115012)
关键词
拜杜法案
介入权
公众利益
The Bayh-Dole Act
March-in rights
Public interest
