期刊文献+

美国航行自由行动体系与遵约议价模式研究——兼论对南海形势的影响 被引量:13

Research on U.S. Freedom of Navigation System and Compliance Bargaining Model:Also on Its Impact on South China Sea
原文传递
导出
摘要 为了提高尚有缺陷的航行自由项目的遵约效力,美国一方面在战略层次上构建全球航行自由行动体系(1),利用一切可资利用的资源促进别国对"航行自由规则"的遵约水平,另一方面通过在全球航行自由行动体系中的实力推进和智慧推进路径组建"联盟"和签订互信协议等方式重塑航行自由项目的遵约环境,为美国提供更有利的遵约议价(2)地位。美国的这一行为方式在南海问题上表现突出,本文试图对此加以梳理,更加全面地考察美国对航行自由权利的维护,这对当前围绕航行自由问题与美国不断发生海上摩擦的中国的决策具有重要意义。 In order to improve the compliance effect of the deficient Freedom of Navigation Project,the United States on the one hand build the global freedom of navigation system at the strategic level,making use of all available resources to promote the compliance level of other countries to the 'freedom of navigation rules'. On the other hand,provide a more favorable compliance bargaining position for U.S. through the powerful approach and sapiential approach to put forward in the global freedom of navigation system to build 'alliance' and signed maritime confidence-building agreements to re-shape the compliance bargaining environment in the FON Program. This model of behavior is obvious on the issue of the South China Sea. This paper tries to sort it out,to make a more comprehensive investigation on this behavior to maintain freedom of navigation rights. It is meaningfulness for China that currently focus on the issue of freedom of navigation with the United States constantly.
作者 吴士存 胡楠
出处 《东北亚论坛》 CSSCI 北大核心 2017年第4期104-116,共13页 Northeast Asia Forum
基金 国家社会科学基金重大项目(14ZDA078)
关键词 推进路径 遵约议价 海洋法公约 海上互信机制 南海 Approach to Put Forward Compliance Bargaining Law of UNCLOS Maritime Confidence-Building Regime South China Sea
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献57

  • 1钱春泰.中美海上军事安全磋商机制初析[J].现代国际关系,2002(4):8-11. 被引量:13
  • 2Sheldon W. Simon, "Conflict and Diplomacy in the South China Sea: The View from Washington," Asian Survey, Vol. 52, No. 6, 2012, pp.998-999.
  • 3Ang Cheng Guan, "The South China Sea Dispute Revisited," Australian Journal of International Affairs, Vol. 54, No. 2, 2000, p. 203.
  • 4Ang Cheng Guan, "The South China Sea Dispute Revisited," p. 207.
  • 5http://www.nansha.org.on/study/8.html,登录时间:2014年4月20日.
  • 6Federal News Service, State Department Briefing, June 18, 1992, http://www, nexis, com,登录时间:2014年1月5日.
  • 7"Work with China on Spratly Row, U.S. Urges ASEAN," Straits Times, March 28, 1992, p. 19, http:// eresources, nlb. gov. sg/newspapers/Digitised/Article/straitstimes19920328-1.2. 29.7. aspx,登录时间:2014年4月30日.
  • 8Susumu Awanohara, "Washington's Priorities: US Emphasizes Freedom of Navigation," Far Eastern Eco- nomic Review, Vol.155, No. 32, 1992, p. 18.
  • 9Dale C. Eikmeier, "Air Defense, Leadership Vacuum: U.S. Actions in the South China Sea," School of Advanced Military Studies, United States Army Command and General Staff College, Fort Leavenworth, AY 7-98, December 7, 1998, p.3.
  • 10Federal News Service, State Department Briefing, April 19, 1995, http://www, nexis, com,登录时间:2014年1月5日.

共引文献103

同被引文献140

引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部