期刊文献+

拒绝抑或谨慎——论重作判决的未来之路 被引量:2

Refused or Cautious——On the Way to the Future of Returning to Judgment
下载PDF
导出
摘要 审判实践中,重作判决作与不作未形成统一的适用标准。分析和考证重作判决的制度归属和功能价值,发现重作判决在诉讼法学、法哲学、法经济学等维度上存在理论缺陷。新《行政诉讼法》虽然沿用了重作判决制度,但新法通过规范诉讼类型,完善给付判决、变更判决等一系列的判决制度,已经改变了重作判决制度的适用空间。 In practice, the referee for the decision and do not form a unified application of the standard. Analyzes and evaluates the institutional attribution and functional value of the retrial judg-ment ,and finds that there is a theoretical flaw in the dimensions of litigation law, legal philosophyand law and economics. However, the new law has changed the applicable space of the system of re-judging judgment by standardizing the type of litigation, perfecting the payment judgment and chan-ging the judgment system.
作者 张平 周小晖
出处 《时代法学》 2017年第4期84-92,共9页 Presentday Law Science
关键词 重作判决 理论缺陷 诉讼类型 rework judgment theoretical defect litigation type
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献69

共引文献140

同被引文献23

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部