摘要
基本公共服务均等化是政府的重要施政目标,也为学术界视为理所当然的发展方向。然而,目前对"基本公共服务"以及"均等化"这两个概念的使用存在问题,致使相关文件对基本公共服务体系的论述不够精当。而且,城乡(区域之间)基本公共服务的均等化并不能实现正义,在实际操作上也不可能达到均等(大体均等)这样的目标,甚至,反而会加剧不均等。因此,基本公共服务重视的不该是"均等",而是"多样化"。
At present, the equalization of basic public services is an important guideline for public policy in China. However, both terms ＂basic public services＂ and ＂equalization＂ lead to problems. The macro-system of basic public services sketched out by the State Council is difficult to implement. In particular, social justice cannot be realized through the equalization of basic public services between regions and between urban and rural areas. In practice, it is very likely that the goal of equalization of basic public services cannot be achieved but will instead intensify disparities. Therefore, this paper argues that basic public services should not be equalized but diversified. To that end, the author proposes a three-layered theory of basic public services as a yardstick for local governments to determine whether certain public ser- vice should be provided or not.
出处
《上海行政学院学报》
CSSCI
北大核心
2017年第4期71-82,共12页
The Journal of Shanghai Administration Institute
基金
国家社科基金重大项目"城乡基本公共服务均等化的实现机制与监测体系研究"(14ZDA030)
国家社科基金一般项目"县域社会治理质量差异及其影响因素的实证研究"(16BZZ061)的阶段性成果
关键词
基本公共服务
均等化
城乡差异
三层理论
Basic Public Services
Equalization
Urban-rural Differences
Three-layered Theory
