期刊文献+

阿米替林对带状疱疹患者神经痛的临床疗效评价 被引量:2

Evaluation on Clinical Efficacy of Amitriptyline in Postherpetic Neuralgia Patients with Shingles
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:评价阿米替林对带状疱疹患者神经痛的临床效果。方法:选取2014年8月—2016年8月期间收治的带状疱疹神经痛患者82例作为研究对象,将其随机分为观察组41例和对照组41例;对照组患者给予卡马西平治疗,观察组患者在对照组患者治疗基础上给予阿米替林治疗,评价两组患者治疗后的总有效率。结果:观察组患者治疗2周、3周、4周后经视觉模拟量表(VAS)和睡眠治疗评分法(QS)的疼痛评分值均低于对照组(P<0.05);观察组患者治疗3周、4周后睡眠质量评分值均低于对照组(P<0.05),治疗的总有效率高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:阿米替林用于治疗带状疱疹患者神经痛的临床疗效较好,能有效改善患者的临床症状。 Objective: To evaluate the clinical efficacy ofamitriptyline in postherpetic neuralgia patients with shingles. Methods: during August 2014 to August 2016, selecting the neuralgia patients with shingles, 82 patients were randomly divided into two groups(41 cases in observation group and 41 cases in the control group); the control group were treated with carbamazepine therapy, the patients in the observation group were treated with amitriptyline besides the treatment in the control group. Results: After the patients in the observation group were treated for 2 weeks, 3 weeks and 4 weeks the pain scores were lower than the control group; there was statistical significance (P〈0.05); after the pa- tients in the observation group were treated for 3 weeks and 4 weeks sleep quality scores were lower than the control group and there was statistical significance (P〈0.05); the treatment efficiency of observation group was statistically higher than the control group. The significance was P〈0.05. Conclusion: Amitriptyline is used in the treatment of neuralgia patients with shingles, the clinical efficacy is better, and the patient's clinical symptoms can be effectively improved.
出处 《抗感染药学》 2017年第3期597-599,共3页 Anti-infection Pharmacy
关键词 阿米替林 带状疱疹神经痛 临床效果 amitriptyline carbamazepine shingles clinical efficacy postherpetic neuralgia patients with shingles
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献63

  • 1房文亮,肖风丽,高顺强,林元珠.带状疱疹患者血浆中P物质、降钙素基因相关肽和血管活性肠肽的测定[J].临床皮肤科杂志,2005,34(6):375-375. 被引量:5
  • 2刘太华,张忠奎,许泽娟,罗陈.带状疱疹临床流行病学分析[J].西南军医,2005,7(6):28-30. 被引量:29
  • 3黄接云,宋文阁,傅志俭.综合疗法治疗带状疱疹后神经痛[J].实用疼痛学杂志,2006,2(1):22-23. 被引量:16
  • 4Bridges D,Thompson SW, Rice AS.Mechanisms of neuropathic pain[J].Br J Anaesth,2001,87(1): 12-26.
  • 5Daris JL,Smith RL.Painfut peripheral diabetic neuropathy treated with venlafaxlne HCL extended release capsules[J].Diabetes C, 1999,22:1909.
  • 6Sils GJ.The mechanisms of action of gabapentin and pregabalin[J]. Curr Opin Pharmacol,2006,6( 1): 108-113.
  • 7Taylor CP.Pregabalin action at a model synapse:binding to presy- naptic calcium channel α2-δ subunit reduces neurotransmission in mice[J].Eur J Pharm Acol,2006,553(1-3):82-88.
  • 8Bian f, Li Z,Offord J,et al.Calcium channel α2-δ type 1 subunit is the major binding protein for pregabalin in neocortex,hippocam pus,amygdala,and spinal cord:an ex vivo autoradiographic study in ct 2- 5 type 1 genetically modified mice[J].Brain Res,2006,1075 (1):68-80.
  • 9Mcclelland D,Evns Rm,Barkworth,et al.A study comparing the actions of gabapentin and pregabalin on the electrophysiological properties of cultured DRG neurones from neonatal rats[J].BMC Pharmacol,2004,4:14.
  • 10Chandra K,Shafiq N,Pandhi P,et al.Gabapentin versus nortriptyline in post herpetic neuralgia patients:a randomized,double blind clinical trial—the GONIP Trial[J].Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther,2006,44:358-363.

共引文献37

同被引文献45

引证文献2

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部