期刊文献+

腰硬联合麻醉在剖宫产中的应用 被引量:2

The Application of the Lumber Hard Joint Anesthesia in Cesarean Section
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨剖宫产术实施腰硬联合麻醉的临床效果。方法单胎剖宫产手术的患者248例,随机分为两组,观察组采用腰硬联合麻醉,对照组患者采用连续硬膜外麻醉,比较两组血动力学变化及麻醉效果及并发症。应用SPSS15.0软件,所获数据方差分析、t检验和2检验。结果两组身高、年龄、体重比较,P>0.05。两组麻醉效果优良率比较,P<0.005。两组不同时段HR比较,T1、T2,P>0.05;T3、T4,P<0.0005;两组不同时段SBP比较,T1、T2,P<0.01;T3、T4,P>0.05;两组不同时段DBP比较,T1,P>0.05;T2、T4,P<0.05;T3,P<0.005。两组不同时段MAP比较,T1、T3,P<0.05;T2、T4,P<0.0005。并发症观察组恶心呕吐11例,占8.87%;寒战3例,占2.42%。对照组头痛1例,占0.81%;恶心呕吐12例,占9.68%;寒战4例,占3.23%。两组比较,P>0.05。结论在剖宫产手术麻醉时选择腰硬联合麻醉效果较好,血液动力学指标优于硬膜外麻醉,不良反应较少,可在临床推广使用。 Objective To explore the clinical effect of cesarean section implement waist hard joint anesthesia. Methods: 248 cases with single tire cesarean section surgery patients, randomly divided into two groups, the observation group USES the waist hard joint anesthesia, control group were treated by continuous epidural anesthesia, comparing two groups of blood dynamics change and anesthetic effect and complications. Using SPSS 15.0 software, data obtained by vari- ance analysis, t test and Zz squared. Results Two groups of height, age, weight, P〉0.05. Anesthesia was compared two groups, P〈0.005. Compare two groups of different times HR, T1, T2, P〉0.05, T3,T4, P〈0.0005. Different time intervals of the two groups of SBP, T1、T2, P〈0.01. T3 、T4, P〉0.05. Compare two groups of DBP in the different periods, T1, P〉0.05. T2, T4, P〈0.05, T3, P〈0.005. Two groups of the MAP in the different periods, T1、T3, P〈0.05, T2 ,T4, P〈0.0005. Complications of observation group of nausea and vomiting in 11 cases, accounting for 8.87%. Chills (3 cases), accounting for 2.42%. Control group headache in 1 case (0.81%), Nausea and vomiting in 12 cases, accounting for 9.68%. Chills 4 cases, accounting for 3.23%. To compare the two groups, P〉0.05. Conclusion In cesarean section surgery anesthesia choice waist hard joint anesthesia effect is good, hemodynamic index is better than that of epidural anesthesia, less adverse reaction, can be used widely in clinical.
作者 袁凤玲
出处 《菏泽医学专科学校学报》 2017年第2期33-35,共3页 Journal of Heze Medical College
关键词 分娩 剖宫产/外科手术 腰硬联合麻醉 Delivery Cesarean delivery/surgery Combined spinal epidural anesthesia
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献65

  • 1饶海丽.瑞芬太尼的药理学与临床应用研究[J].中国现代药物应用,2009,3(5):98-99. 被引量:10
  • 2张海青,宋扬,单祥英,魏建凤,李生德.罗哌卡因蛛网膜下隙阻滞在新式剖宫产术中的应用[J].青岛大学医学院学报,2004,40(4):346-348. 被引量:6
  • 3袁力勇,甘果,王霞民,姚跃娟.静脉应用不同剂量氯胺酮超前镇痛对妇科腹腔镜手术后疼痛的影响[J].现代实用医学,2004,16(12):728-729. 被引量:3
  • 4谢言虎,方才.瑞芬太尼的临床应用现状[J].国外医学(麻醉学与复苏分册),2005,26(5):298-300. 被引量:109
  • 5Hansen EG, Duedahl TH,Romsing J, et al. Intra-operative remifentanil might influence pain levels in the immediate postoperative period after major abdominal surgery[J]. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 2005,49(10): 1464-1470.
  • 6Trafton JA, Abbadie C, Marek K, et al. Postsynaptic signaling via the[mu]-opioid receptor: Responses of dorsat horn neurons to exogenous opioids and noxious stimulation[J].J Neurosci, 2000, 20(23): 8578-8584.
  • 7Borgland SL.Acute opioid receptor desensitization and tolerance: Is there a link [J].Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol, 2001, 28 (3): 147-154.
  • 8Celerier E, Laulin J, Larcher A, et al. Evidence for opiate-activated NMDA processes masking opiate analgesia in rats[J]. Brain Res, 1999, 847(1): 18-25.
  • 9Brennan TJ,Vandermeulen EP,Gebhart GF. Characterization of a rat model of incisional pain[J]. Pain,1996,64(3):493-501.
  • 10Kapfer B,Alfonsi P,Guigrard B,et al. Nefopam and ketamine comparably enhance pestoperation analgesia[J]. Anesth Analg, 2005,100(1):169-174.

共引文献55

同被引文献8

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部