期刊文献+

从第13届PSAM国际会议的动态展望概率安全评估发展 被引量:1

Trends of Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management Based on an Overview of the 13^(th) PSAM International Conference
下载PDF
导出
摘要 自2015年东方之星翻沉事故和天津港爆炸事故发生后,交通安全研究越来越受到学术界的广泛关注和重视。介绍了第13届概率安全评估和管理国际会议(13th International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management,PSAM 13)的概况。通过对该国际会议的大会报告和所发表论文进行分类统计,围绕系统安全研究的主题,对概率安全评估、人因可靠性分析、工业安全、交通运输安全和不确定性等研究热点问题的总结。旨在探讨"一带一路"大背景下,如何通过概率安全评价等理论的研究提高交通系统安全水平。对交通系统概率安全评估未来的发展趋势和目标进行探讨,提出了基于概率安全评估的交通系统安全评价框架,为预防交通事故、提升交通系统安全水平提供帮助。 Since the overturn accident of "Eastern Star" and the explosion in Tianjin Port, traffic safety has become one of the hottest themes. This paper introduces general information of the 13th International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management (PSAM 13). Keynote presentations and technical papers are categorized according to their subjects. Hot topics in the field of system safety including probabilistie safety assessment theory, human reliability analysis theory, industrial safety theory, transportation safety theory, as well as uncertainties are summarized. Discus- sions are also made on how to use PSA theory to improve safety of transportation along with the implementation of China's "the Belt and Road Initiative". Future trends on probabilistic safety assessment of transport system from the PSAM 13 have been illustrated. Furthermore, a framework of safety assessment on transport system based on probabilistic safety assess ment theory is developed in order to prevent traffic accidents and improve traffic safety.
出处 《交通信息与安全》 CSCD 2017年第1期10-18,54,共10页 Journal of Transport Information and Safety
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(51579203) 国家科技支撑计划项目(2015BAG20B01)资助
关键词 交通系统 交通安全 概率安全评估 人因可靠性 不确定性 transportation system traffic safety probabilistie safety assessment ~ human reliability analysis un- certainty
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献127

  • 1张笛,严新平,张金奋,万程鹏.基于模糊层次分析法的枯水期长江通航风险评价研究[J].交通信息与安全,2013,31(3):82-86. 被引量:15
  • 2王雷,江朝华,徐鹏.大城市商业区停车诱导系统应用开发[J].交通信息与安全,2009,27(S1):95-98. 被引量:5
  • 3黄昆,蒋宏业,李余斌,于磊,马国光.LPG储罐火灾与爆炸事故分析[J].西南石油学院学报,2004,26(5):74-76. 被引量:24
  • 4[4]Brooke Phillip J,Paige Richard F.Fault trees for security system design and analysis[J].Computers and Security,2003,22(3):256-264.
  • 5[5]Andrews J D.The use of not logic in fault tree analysis[J].Quality and Reliability Engineering International,2001,17(3):143-150.
  • 6[7]Hsieh,Yih-Huang.Hydration of the carbonyl group -acetic acid catalysis in the co-operative mechanism[J].Canadian Journal of Chemistry,2005,83(6):769-785.
  • 7[8]Lapp Steven A.Applications of fault tree analysis to maintenance interval extension and vulnerability assessment[J].Process Safety Progress,2005,24(2):91-97.
  • 8[9]Xiang Jianwen,Futatsugi Kokichi,He Yanxiang.Fault tree and formal methods in system safety analysis[J].Computer and Information Technology,2004,24(2):1108-1115.
  • 9[10]Rothschild Marc.Fault tree and layer of protection hybrid risk analysis[J].Process Safety Progress,2004,23(3):185-190.
  • 10KIM M C, SEONG P H. An analytic model for situation assessment of nuclear power plant oper ators based on Bayesian inferenee[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2006, 91: 270- 282.

共引文献158

同被引文献7

引证文献1

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部