摘要
分析建筑师负责制与工程监理制的内涵,并从落实设计意图与提升建筑品质、工程施工质量安全保障、沟通效率及业主方项目管理等四个维度进行效果比较,发现建筑师负责制更加有利于落实设计意图和密切设计施工协作,且施工现场质量安全责任主体更加明确;而工程监理制尽管可以提供更加专业的工程管理服务,但由于与项目其他主体之间权责界定不清、介入项目实施过程过晚等原因,价值并不能得到有效发挥。研究显示,我国应借鉴建筑师负责制的核心思想,积极发展设计与管理相统一的全过程工程咨询。
This paper analyzes the connotation of the architect responsibility system and the supervision-engineer system,and compares the effects in the following 4 aspects：design intention implementation and architectural design improvement,construction quality and safety assurance,communication efficiency,and owner＇s project management services. Research shows that the architect responsibility system works better on ensuring the design intention to be followed in construction,and promoting the coordination of design and construction during construction phase,under the clear distribution of quality liability between the architect and the contractor. Chinese supervision-engineer system should have served the owner better on its specialized construction project management services. However,this value was badly impaired by the opaque definition of the supervisionengineer＇s on-site liability and the absence of pre-construction services. China should follow the core idea of architect responsibility system,and encourage the engineering consulting services to cover all the project implementation processes and to work in an integrative way.
出处
《建筑经济》
2017年第8期5-11,共7页
Construction Economy
关键词
建筑师负责制
工程监理制
设计意图
工程咨询
architect responsibility system
supervision-engineer system
design intention
engineering consulting
