摘要
目的探讨对小儿哮喘采用不同雾化吸入方式治疗的临床效果。方法选取该院儿科在2015年11月—2016年11月期间收治的小儿哮喘患儿112例作为研究对象,对患儿进行编号,1~112号,奇数号为对照组,采用超声雾化吸入方式进行治疗,偶数号为观察组,采用空气压缩泵式雾化吸入方式治疗,对比两组患儿治疗的效果。结果观察组治疗的有效率为94.64%,而对照组治疗的有效率为82.14%,两组对比差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);经过治疗,两组患儿的FVC以及Pa O2都得到显著的改善,且观察组改善的程度更加明显,与对照组相比差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组患儿各种主要临床症状消失的时间明显短于对照组(P<0.05),两组对比差异有统计学意义。另外,观察组不良反应发生率3.57%,明显低于对照组的10.71%,两组对比差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论对于小儿哮喘患儿采用空气压缩泵式雾化吸入治疗效果更加显著,值得临床推广。
Objective To study the clinical effect of different aerosol inhalation methods in treatment of asthma in children. Methods 112 cases of children with asthma admitted and treated in our department in our hospital from November 2015 to November 2016 were selected and divided into two groups, the control group adopted the ultrasound aerosol inhalation, while the observation group adopted the air compressor pump-type aerosol inhalation treatment, and the treatment effect was compared between the two groups. Results The difference in the treatment effective rate between the observation group and the control group had statistical significance （94.64% vs 82.14%）,（P〈0.05）, after treat- ment, the FVC and Pa02 were obviously improved, and the improvement degree in the observation group was more ob- vious, and the differefice between groups had statistical significance （P〈0.05）, and various major clinical symptoms dis- appearance time in the observation group was obviously shorter than that in the control group （P〈0.05）, and the differ- ence had statistical significance, besides, the incidence rate of adverse reactions in the observation group was obviously lower than that in the control group （3.57% vs 10.71%）,（P〈0.05）. Conclusion The effect of air compressor pump-type aerosol inhalation treatment for children with asthma is more obvious, which is worth clinical promotion.
出处
《系统医学》
2017年第6期66-69,共4页
Systems Medicine
关键词
小儿哮喘
超声雾化吸入
空气压缩泵式雾化吸入
效果
Asthma in children
Ultrasound aerosol inhalation
Air compressor pump-type aerosol inhalation
Effect
