摘要
英国学者Charteris-Black提出的批评隐喻分析为研究真实语境中的隐喻提供了定量及定性的分析方法。然而,该理论虽拓展了批评话语分析的研究视角,却未能阐明隐喻因何产生论辩修辞效果。这是因为相关研究对隐喻间的语义联动关注不足,缺乏动态整合视角,因而无法系统地呈现隐喻的认知机制。本文将隐喻情节概念纳入对媒体话语的隐喻分析,并以美国主流报刊对"一带一路"倡议的报道作为分析案例。研究发现,隐喻的语义联动构成文本情节,是媒体话语中隐喻产生论辩修辞效果的重要发生环节。对隐喻叙事进行分析可带来更具交互性和动态性的研究视角,利于从认知角度揭示隐喻产生论辩修辞效果的动因。
Proposed by Jonathan Charteris-Black, Critical Metaphor Analysis provides quantitative and qualitative methods for studying metaphors in use. It offers a cognitive linguistic approach to Critical Dis- course Analysis. However, the current approach cannot account for why metaphors produce rhetorical and argumentative effects. This is mainly because current research methods of Critical Metaphor Analysis fail to investigate the interaction of metaphors in context, which results in a static and limited research scope. This paper explores metaphor scenarios in U.S. mainstream media reports on the Belt and Road Initia- tive. It is revealed that the interaction of metaphors gives rise to metaphor scenarios, which provide con- ceptual structures that are argumentatively and rhetorically exploitable. Analyzing metaphor scenarios thus brings forth interactive and dynamic perspectives, which contribute to explaining the rhetorical and argu- mentative effects of metaphors from a cognitive point of view.
出处
《山东外语教学》
2017年第4期17-26,共10页
Shandong Foreign Language Teaching
基金
2017-2018学年度中美富布赖特联合培养博士生项目的前期研究成果
关键词
隐喻叙事
隐喻情节
批评隐喻分析
媒体话语
metaphorical narrative
metaphor scenario
Critical Metaphor Analysis
media discourse
