期刊文献+

基于双边Shapley值网损分摊计算分析 被引量:1

Analysis of Transmission Losses Calculation Based on Bilateral Shapley Value
下载PDF
导出
摘要 随着电力市场化改革,自备电厂为实现利益最大化,作为转供电源为企业用户提供电能,电网为其提供输电服务,电厂和用户需承担电能在输送过程中造成的损耗。Shapley值分摊法可以解决电能在传输中该分摊的损耗,既考虑了市场成员在集体中的作用,对交叉项进行了合理的分摊,同时又可为市场和用户提供经济鼓励信号。但当系统存在多交易时,因交易联盟个数过多而导致无法用Shapley值分摊法计算,对此采用双边Shapley值分摊法来解决实际电网由于交易个数过多造成的组合"爆炸"问题。实例计算结果表明,该方法和传统Shapley值分摊法分摊结果接近,而计算量大大减少,在工程计算中可作为Shapley值分摊法的近似解,解决了自备电厂因转供造成的网损分摊问题。 With the reform of electric power market, self-generation power plant as the transfer power supply of users to provide power for the grid users to maximize the benefits, the power grid provides transmission services, power plants and users should bear the loss caused by the electricity transmission in the process. Shapley value allocation method can solve the power transmission in the allocation of loss, considering the role of market members in the collective, reasonable allocation of cross terms, while provides economic signals to the market and the user. However, when there are many transactions in the system, resulting in a number of transactions too much and can not be calculated with the Shapley value. This article uses the bilateral Shapley value allocation method to solve the actual system because of the excessive number of transactions and the combination of explosion problem. The engineering example shows that this method is close to the traditional Shapley value sharing engineering calculation, it can be results, and the computation is greatly reduced. In the regarded as the approximate solution of Shapley value.
出处 《内蒙古电力技术》 2017年第4期1-4,共4页 Inner Mongolia Electric Power
关键词 自备电厂 转供 SHAPLEY值 双边Shapley值 网损分摊 self-generation power plant transferring power Shapley value bilateral Shapley value allocation of transmission losses
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献33

  • 1屈靖,郭剑波.“九五”期间我国电网事故统计分析[J].电网技术,2004,28(21):60-62. 被引量:109
  • 2何大愚.对于美国西部电力系统1996年7月2日大停电事故的初步认识[J].电网技术,1996,20(9):35-39. 被引量:52
  • 3卢卫星,舒印彪,史连军.美国西部电力系统1996年8月10日大停电事故[J].电网技术,1996,20(9):40-42. 被引量:44
  • 4[4]Conejo A J, Galiana F D, Kockar Ivana. Z-bus Loss Allocation. IEEE Trans on Power Systems, 2001, 16(1): 105~110
  • 5[5]Rau N S. Transmission Loss and Congestion Cost Allocation--An Approach Based on Responsibility. IEEE Trans on Power Systems, 2000, 15(4): 1401~1409
  • 6[6]Alberto Berizzi, Cristian Bovo, Paolo Marannino. Allocation of Transmission Losses in Presence of Both Bilateral and Pool Market Models. In: Proceedings of 22nd IEEE Power Engineering Society International Conference on Power Industry Computer Applications. Sydney(Australia): 2001. 336~341
  • 7[7]Galiana F D, Conejo A J, Kockar Ivana. Incremental Transmission Loss Allocation Under Pool Dispatch. IEEE Trans on Power Systems, 2002, 17(1): 26~33
  • 8[8]Tan X, Lie T T. Application of the Shapley Value on Transmission Cost Allocation in the Competitive Power Market Environment. IEE Proceedings--Gener, Transm & Distrib, 2002, 149(1): 15~20
  • 9DL755-2001.电力系统安全稳定导则[S].[S].,..
  • 10Steinmetz C P. Power control and stability of electric generating stations[J], AIEE Transaction, 1920, XXXIX(Ⅱ): 1215-1287.

共引文献191

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部