摘要
现有地方政府规章对重大行政决策事项范围的规定,不仅存有差异,甚而相互冲突,加之过于原则与抽象而缺乏可操作性。其纠偏路径在于,应该在制定地方政府规章时规定行政决策涉及的资金达到政府财政收入的一个适度的具体比值,而不是直接规定行政决策涉及资金的具体数值;对基本权利的界定应以宪法文本为标准,但有必要对宪法文本中基本权利作一种体系化的诠释。所以,应按照法治的基本精神,将"重大行政决策"的具体范围限定为:当行政决策是具体行政行为时,其涉及的资金达到本级人民政府财政收入的适当比例时就是重大行政决策;当行政决策是抽象行政行为时,只要其涉及公民基本权利时就属于重大行政决策。前者从数量的角度对重大行政决策进行限定是数学理性影响下法律形式化的必然要求;后者从基本权利的角度对重大行政决策进行限定是权利作为法的基石范畴的应然要求。
Two problems can be identified in the definitions of the scope of major administrative decisions in the current regulations issued by local governments in China： the definitions are usually different or even in confficts with each other; or they are just some general principles, which are too abstract to be applied to relevant practices. To resolve these problems, the local governments are supposed to prescribe that the fund involved in an administrative decision should reach a proper specific ratio to the government＇s revenue rather than a fixed amount when determining whether or not the decision can be identified as a major one. ff an administrative decision involves people＇s basic rights, whether it can be regarded as a major decision should be determined by the defin fion of the basic rights in the Constitution in combination with a systematic interpretation of the constitutional definition. Therefore, following the spirit of rule of law, the scope of ＂major administrative decisions＂ is supposed to be specifically defined as follows. If an administrative decision is a concrete one and the fund it involves reaches the required ratio to the governmental revenue, it will be regarded as a major decision;if the decision is an abstract one which involves people＇s basic rights, it will be regarded as a major decision too. The former, a definition of major administrative decision from the perspective of financial quantity, is an inevitable requirement on legal form under the influence of the mathematic rationality, while the latter, a definition from the perspective of people＇s basic rights, is the necessary requirement of basing laws on the protection of human rights.
出处
《南京师大学报（社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2017年第5期44-53,共10页
Journal of Nanjing Normal University(Social Science Edition)
基金
国家社科基金项目"包容性增长中的不平等及其法律应对研究"(14BFX139)阶段性成果
关键词
重大行政决策
公共财政
基本权利
决策法治化
major administrative decision
public finance
basic fights
law-based decision
